Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: 蒙古與南西伯利亞匈奴考古文化初探
A Preliminary Analysis of the Archaeological Culture of Hsiung-Nu in Mongolia and South Siberia
Authors: 國立臺灣師範大學歷史學系
Issue Date: 2008
Abstract: 個人在2005年完成的博士論文中,曾對大陸的匈奴考古有過初步研究,文中探討了大陸匈奴考古所存在的一些方法論問題,這些問題主要集中在:一、墓葬斷代不明;二、缺乏與蒙古國及俄羅斯境內的匈奴墓葬作比較;三、對於墓葬族屬認定常有推論過當的情形。礙時提交時間,當時無法對大陸以外的匈奴考古作整體的研究,因此本計畫擬在個人博士論文的基礎上,先鎖定蒙古國及俄羅斯南西伯利亞地區的匈奴考古,作一整體的比較研究。希望能接續先前的研究,探討匈奴考古所涉及的方法論問題。 有關匈奴考古的最新研究,當推大陸學者馬利清的新作《原匈奴、匈奴》。在該書中,馬氏提出了「原匈奴」的新概念,個人覺得這個新概念有必要作一檢視。同時希望透過對蒙古及南西伯利亞地區北匈奴墓葬的整體研究,觀察匈奴考古所習用的一些概念及方法是否存在著問題。此外,本計畫也將探索匈奴與南西伯利亞地區早期游牧民的相互關係,期望能對匈奴起源問題提供新的看法。
In my Ph.D disserration that finished in 2005,I made a tentive study on the archaeology of Hsiung-nu in mainland China,and finds there are some problems in the works that made by China’s Archaeologists,especially about the Methodology.By the sake of limit of the presentation time,I haven’t use the archaeological sources about the Hsiung-nu that finds in Mongolia and South Siberia, and therefore I want to make a more whoely study in the project on the problems of the archaeological cultures about Northern Hsiung-nu in Mongolia,Trans-baikal and Altai regions. China’s Archaeologist Prof. Ma Li-qing in her recent work Original Xiong-nu and Xiong-nu proposed such a new concept “Original Hsiung -nu",was the new concept propriety used on the discussions about the origin of Hsiung –nu? In my opinion it might be need more discsstions.Besides,I also want to inquiring the affinities between the Hsiung-nu and the early Nomads in South Siberia,and hope to find some new insights concerning the original questions of the Hsiung-nu.
Other Identifiers: ntnulib_tp_B0315_04_001
Appears in Collections:教師著作

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.