運用概念導向閱讀教學帶領高中生主題探究之行動研究

Abstract

本研究源於研究者對於素養導向與自主探究的教育趨勢之下，國語文教師如何在國語文課中培養學生運用閱讀進行探究之好奇，因此研究者運用概念導向閱讀教學框架（Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction）來發展一套教學方案，帶領高中生進行主題探究，並檢視實施歷程中，學生主題探究與閱讀動機的表現，以及研究者的成長。本研究採用行動研究法，研究場域為臺北市一所實驗教育的高中語文選修課，共 4 位學生。本研究共分為兩期：行動期與調整期。在研究過程中，研究者以參與式觀察、檔案文件分析、訪談之方式蒐集資料，並對資料進行整理與分析。

本研究的結論如下：

一、根據本教學方案實施歷程，在觀察與個人化階段，使學生有連結個人生活經驗的機會是關鍵；在搜尋與檢索階段，幫助學生釐清「哪些是與探究主題相關」的問題是讓學生展開搜尋的關鍵；在理解與統整階段，使學生討論各自所讀，並提供寫作的鷹架是關鍵；在與他人溝通階段，教師設計真實的溝通情境是關鍵。 二、實施歷程中，學生的主題探究表現為：（一）學生能提出觀察並提問，不過觀察記錄的表現較弱；（二）學生能用關鍵字搜尋資料並判斷其與探究主題的關聯性，不過找到新關鍵字來搜尋資料的表現較弱；（三）學生皆能理解並整合文本，且能完成一份連貫的書寫報告；（四）大部分學生能口頭分享成果並與聽眾溝通。 三、實施歷程中，學生的閱讀動機表現為：（一）學生皆因內在動機而閱讀；（二）學生皆因服從而閱讀，大部分學生因社會理由而閱讀；（三）學生皆因願意挑戰複雜文章而閱讀，皆沒有逃避閱讀的情形。另外大部分學生因相信其能成功閱讀而閱讀。四、 研究者的收穫與成長分別為（一）在教學觀念上，了解CORI是心法，沒有固定的方法；（二）在教學設計上，反思CORI教室在線上時應運用科技工具使協作更順暢；（三）在教師信念上，對閱讀素養能力再理解。研究者根據上述結論，提出對於運用概念導向閱讀教學進行教學或研究之建議，以供實務工作者或未來研究者參考。This study originates from the researcher's curiosity about how Mandarin teachers can foster students to do thematic inquiry with reading in the Mandarin class. To achieve this, the researcher adopts the Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction to develop an instructional program, guiding high school students in conducting thematic inquiries. Additionally, the study evaluates the students' performance in thematic inquiry and reading motivation throughout the implementation process, while also reflecting on the researcher's own growth.

This research study utilized an action research approach. Research field is in a Mandarin elective course of an experimental education of Taipei City. This course had 4 students. This study had two periods: the action period and the adjustment period. During the process, the researcher collected data by participant observation, documents, interviews, and then analyzed data.The conclusions of this study are as follows: 1. According to the process of instructional program：(1)In the phase of Observe and Personalize, the key is having students opportunities to connect with their personal life experiences; (2)In the phase of Search and Retrieve, the key is helping students to clarify "what is related to the theme of inquiry";(3) In the phase of Comprehend and Integrate, the key is having students opportunities to discuss what they have read and providing a scaffold for writing; (4)In the phase of communicating to others, the key is to design an authentic context for communicating.2. Performance of thematic inquiry:(1) Students can do observations and ask questions, but the performance of recording is poor; (2) Students can use keywords to search for information and judge its relevance to the theme of inquiry, but the performance of finding new keywords to search for information is poor (3) All students can comprehend and integrate the text, also write a coherent report; (4) Most of the students can share the results orally and communicate with the audience.3. Performance of reading motivation: (1) Students all read because of intrinsic motivation; (2) Students all read because of compliance, and most students read for social reasons; (3) students all read because of the willing to challenge complex texts and have no reading work avoidance. In addition, most students read because of the beliefs of successful reading.4. The growth of researcher: (1) For thinking of instruction, understanding that CORI is more like a mindset, rather than a method; (2) For designing instruction, teachersshould use digital tools to build a smooth collaboration when CORI Classroom is online; (3) For teacher beliefs, researcher re-understood reading literacy.Based on the above conclusions, the researchers put forward suggestions on the use of concept-oriented reading teaching for teaching or research, for the reference of practitioners or future researchers.