北部技專校院教師休閒需求、休閒參與及滿意度之研究

Abstract

本研究主要目的在探討北部技專校院教師休閒需求、休閒參及滿意度現況，不同背景變項有無顯著差異、此外休閒需求、休閒參及滿意度相關情形，本研究採用問卷調查研究，研究對象為臺灣北部93學年度28所公私立科技大學、技術學院日間部專任教師，以分層抽樣進行調查，共發出問卷400份，回收有效樣本363份，有效回收率90.8％。回收問卷資料以項目分析、描述性統計、獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數分析(one-way ANOVA)、皮爾森積差相關等方法進行統計分析，根據研究結果，歸納幾點結論： 一、北部技專教師之休閒需求現況以健康需求獲得重視、休閒參與頻率最頻繁現況以視聽活動為主、休閒滿意度之現況以放鬆方面有相當程度滿意。 二、不同人口統計變項對教師休閒需求，未因職稱、任教學院、婚姻狀況、家庭狀況、家庭月總收入而有差異，其餘包括性別、年齡、級職、服務年資等四變項，均達到顯著差異。 三、不同人口統計變項對教師休閒參與，未因級職、任教學院、婚姻狀況、家庭狀況、家庭月總收入而有差異，其餘包括性別、年齡、職稱、服務年資等四變項，均達到顯著差異。 四、不同人口統計變項對教師休閒滿意度，未因職稱、任教學院、婚姻狀況、家庭狀況而有差異，其餘包括性別、年齡、級職、服務年資、家庭月總收入等五變項，均存在顯著差異。 五、北部技專教師的休閒需求與休閒參與項目有存在正相關。 六、北部技專教師的休閒參與項目與休閒滿意度有存在正相關。A Study on the Leisure Need, Leisure Participation and Leisure Satisfaction of Teachers in Technology Colleges in Northern Taiwan Abstract 2006-06 Author：Gen-Beu Sun Advisor：Wen-Tseng Chu The purpose of this study was to explore the social status and the differences of the leisure need, leisure participation and leisure satisfaction of teachers in technology colleges in northern Taiwan under different variances, and their correlation. Questionnaire survey was used in this study, and the targets studied were the teachers in 28 public and private technology universities and colleges in northern Taiwan. With stratified random sampling, 400 copies of questionnaire were distributed, and 363 copies were recollected. The availability was 90.8%. The collected data was analyzed with item analysis, descriptive statistic, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation. The following conclusions are deducted from the outcome of the research: 1. Among the surveyed teachers, health need was highly emphasized on leisure need; audio-video activities were the most frequent activity in the status quo of leisure participation, and the relaxation after leisure activities got the highest satisfaction. 2. There were no differences in those teachers’ leisure need while examining the demographic variances such as position, school, marriage, family or total income, but there were differences when considering gender, age, rank and tenure. 3. There were no differences in those teachers’ leisure participation with demographic variances of rank, school, marriage, family or total income; but there were prominent differences when examining gender, age, position and tenure. 4. In leisure satisfaction, there were no differences with position, department, marriage or family, but there were differences with gender, age, rank, tenure and total income. 5. There was prominent correlation between leisure need and the activity-choice of leisure participation. 6. There was prominent correlation between the activity-choice of leisure participation and the degree of satisfaction.