新北市教育人員對教師工會會務假觀點之研究

Abstract

本研究旨在探討新北市教育人員對教師工會會務假的觀點，以新北市公立國中小的校長、教師工會的教師和學校教師的觀點切入，研究方法以文獻探討與訪談法為主。

在文獻探討部份，探究會務假之內涵、會務假的認定釋疑以及國內其他工會會務假實施情形；在訪談法部份，訪談新北市國中小的校長、產業工會的會務幹部以及一般學校教師對教師工會會務假之看法。

最後，依據前述之研究發現，提出本研究結論如下：一、新北市教師工會會務假現行做法為依公文向學校申請會務假，所需鐘點費用由工會代為支出。二、教育人員對教師工會會務假的共同主張為針對教師工會的價值與代表性應加以檢視，並以特別法規範教師工會。三、部分教育人員認為教師工會會務假對學生的受教權會受到影響。四、會務假的協商對象仍有疑義，校長為核假人員但教育局擁有最後的核可權。五、會務假的適用對象除理、監事外，其餘幹部是否適用仍有疑義，需透過協商約定。六、約定會務假時所需克服的問題為要先確認會務人員是否確為處理會務及因會務假所產生的代課費用應由誰支付。七、約定會務假時應注意之事項為應以和諧理性的方式溝通協調及要考量是否只是在爭取教師福利，顧慮社會觀感。

根據研究結果本研究提出建議供政策當局與政策分析家參酌。The study was designed to investigate New Taipei City educators’ view to the union affairs false of teachers union. The educators in this research depict New Taipei City public junior high schools and elementary schools principals, the teachers of teachers’ union. The methodology in this research is based on literature review and interviews.

The literature review includes the the connotations of the union affairs false, the explanation to the suspect of the union affairs false, and the implementation of the affairs false of other domestic unions. On the other hand, the interview method is used to realize the opinion of the union affairs false towards New Taipei City public junior high school and elementary school principals and teachers.

At the last part, the major results from the prior researches were summerized as follows: (1) New Taipei City teachers' union affairs false is in accordance with the current practice of false documents to apply to the school, and the hourly fees must be paid by the union. (2) Educators’ common claims to teachers' union affairs false are to examine the teachers' unions values and representatives. Moreover, the educators union should be standarized by the specific law. (3) Some educators think that teachers' union affairs false may affect student rights to education. (4) Consultations objects towards the union affairs false are still in doubt. Though the principals have approval rights, EDB has the final authority. (5) Except for the suitable objects for union affairs false, the directors and supervisors , it’s still disputed whether other administers are applicable or not and the agreement should be under the negotiation. (6) The problems to overcome that happened on arranging the union affairs false are as below. First, to make sure if the members handle with the affairs related. Second, to confirm that people who should pay for the substitute fees because of the union affairs false. (7) The union affairs false arrangement should be negotiated in the rational and harmonious way and be considered if only striving for the teachers’ welfare under the consideration of the social perception.

According to the research results, this study has concluded some suggestions to the policy authority and policy analysts.