莊子、向郭與支遁之消遙觀試析
dc.contributor.author | 沈維華 | zh_tw |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-10-27T15:42:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-10-27T15:42:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1998-03-?? | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | 莊子哲學可以逍遙二字貫通之。何謂逍遙﹖歷來學者詮釋不一。本文先分別以「無待無為」、「適性」、「即色義」來揭示莊子、向郭、支遁三家之逍遙觀。再進而比較三者之關係,從中探討以下兩個問題: 一是向郭逍遙義能否真的相應莊子之旨趣﹖一是支遁的逍遙義真能取代向郭之原注嗎﹖希望藉由對原典的解讀與理解,能對逍遙義有較周全的認識。綜觀莊子、向郭與支遁三家之逍遙義,儘管其觀點不一,然卻有其共通之處,即是惟有在無待境地上的聖人,才稱得上真正的逍遙。 | zh_tw |
dc.identifier | 9268F6BE-8C75-E09B-BE23-C255231E50BF | zh_TW |
dc.identifier.uri | http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/24911 | |
dc.language | 中文 | zh_TW |
dc.publisher | 國文學系 | zh_tw |
dc.publisher | Department of Chinese, NTNU | en_US |
dc.relation | (19),145-160 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.ispartof | 中國學術年刊 | zh_tw |
dc.subject.other | 逍遙 | zh_tw |
dc.subject.other | 莊子 | zh_tw |
dc.subject.other | 向郭 | zh_tw |
dc.subject.other | 支遁 | zh_tw |
dc.subject.other | 無待 | zh_tw |
dc.subject.other | 無為 | zh_tw |
dc.subject.other | 適性 | zh_tw |
dc.subject.other | 即色義 | zh_tw |
dc.subject.other | Hsiao yao | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Enjoy a free and easy life | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Chuang Tzu | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Hsiang Kuo | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Chih tun | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Non-egotism | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Abandon self-assertion preserve a tranquil mind and there will be no opposition between self and others | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Inaction | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Follow the nature The connotation of outward appearance and emptiness | en_US |
dc.title | 莊子、向郭與支遁之消遙觀試析 | zh-tw |