等長與等速活化後增能對女子足球選手反覆衝刺與敏捷性之影響
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2017
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
目的：探討等長與等速活化後增能 (postactivation potentiation, PAP) 對女子足球選手反覆衝刺 (repeated sprint ability, RSA) 與敏捷性 (repeated change of direction, RCOD) 之影響。方法：本實驗共招募12名女性大專足球運動員為研究對象。以重複量數、平衡次序之實驗設計，讓受試者分別接受三種不同實驗處理，包括控制處理 (CON) 、等長腿部推蹬處理 (isometric leg press, ILP，10組 × 1.5秒，組間休息2分鐘) 及等速腿部推蹬處理 (isokinetic leg press, IKLP，3組 × 5秒，組間休息30秒) ，於實驗處理後進行RSA或RCOD測驗。每項實驗處理間隔至少間隔48小時。測驗過程中記綠每趟衝刺時間，對最快 (fast time, FT) 、平均 (average time, AT) 與總時間 (total time, TT) 進行分析。結果：在RSA測驗方面，FT (CON vs. ILP vs. IKLP，3.49 ± 0.08 vs. 3.49 ± 0.09 vs. 3.48 ± 0.06秒，p > .05) 、AT (CON vs. ILP vs. IKLP，3.56 ± 0.10 vs. 3.57 ± 0.09 vs. 3.58 ± 0.08秒，p > .05) 與TT (CON vs. ILP vs. IKLP，21.40 ± 0.64 vs. 21.44 ± 0.58 vs. 21.50 ± 0.49 秒p > .05)，在三種實驗處理之間，皆未達顯著差異 (p > .05) ；在RCOD部分，FT (CON vs. ILP vs. IKLP，5.29 ± 0.22 vs. 5.26 ± 0.18 vs. 5.30 ± 0.21秒，p > .05) 、AT (CON vs. ILP vs. IKLP，5.39 ± 0.20 vs. 5.37 ± 0.16 vs. 5.43 ± 0.19秒，p > .05) 與TT (CON vs. ILP vs. IKLP，32.36 ± 1.23 vs. 32.23 ± 1.00 vs. 32.59 ± 1.19秒，p > .05) ，在三種實驗處理之間，亦未達顯著差異 (p > .05) 。結論：女子足球運動員利用ILP或IKLP進行熱身時，無法提升RSA或RCOD衝刺測驗之運動表現，其下原因可能與過高強度造成疲勞有關。
Purpose: To investigate the acute effects of postactivation potentiation (PAP) induced by isometric and isokinetic contractions on repeated sprint ability (RSA) and repeated change of direction (RCOD) in female soccer players. Methods: Twelve collegiate female soccer players participated into this repeated-measured and counter-balanced designed study. Participants performed three treatments, the control (CON), the isometric leg press (ILP: 10 sets of 1.5 sec, 2-min rest intervals), and the isokinetic leg press treatment (IKLP: 3 sets of 5 sec, 30-sec rest intervals), with 48 hours apart. The RSA and RCOD performances were measured prior to and 5 min after treatments. The fast time (FT), average time (AT) and total time (TT) for each sprint were analysed. Results: No significant effects on FT (CON vs. ILP vs. IKLP, 3.49 ± 0.08 vs. 3.49 ± 0.09 vs. 3.48 ± 0.06 sec, p >.05), AT (CON vs. ILP vs. IKLP, 3.56 ± 0.10 vs. 3.57 ± 0.09 vs. 3.58 ± 0.08 sec, p >.05), and TT (CON vs. ILP vs. IKLP, 21.40 ± 0.64 vs. 21.44 ± 0.58 vs. 21.50 ± 0.49 sec, p > .05) were found among treatments during RSA test. There were also no significant effects on FT (CON vs. ILP vs. IKLP, 5.29 ± 0.22 vs. 5.26 ± 0.18 vs. 5.30 ± 0.21 sec, p >.05), AT (CON vs. ILP vs. IKLP, 5.39 ± 0.20 vs. 5.37 ± 0.16 vs. 5.43 ± 0.19 sec, p >.05), and TT (CON vs. ILP vs. IKLP, 32.36 ± 1.23 vs. 32.23 ± 1.00 vs. 32.59 ± 1.19 sec, p > .05) among treatments during RCOD test. Conclusion: The ILP and IKLP warm-up activities might result in fatigue, thus unchanging the subsequent RSA and RCOD performances in female soccer players.
Purpose: To investigate the acute effects of postactivation potentiation (PAP) induced by isometric and isokinetic contractions on repeated sprint ability (RSA) and repeated change of direction (RCOD) in female soccer players. Methods: Twelve collegiate female soccer players participated into this repeated-measured and counter-balanced designed study. Participants performed three treatments, the control (CON), the isometric leg press (ILP: 10 sets of 1.5 sec, 2-min rest intervals), and the isokinetic leg press treatment (IKLP: 3 sets of 5 sec, 30-sec rest intervals), with 48 hours apart. The RSA and RCOD performances were measured prior to and 5 min after treatments. The fast time (FT), average time (AT) and total time (TT) for each sprint were analysed. Results: No significant effects on FT (CON vs. ILP vs. IKLP, 3.49 ± 0.08 vs. 3.49 ± 0.09 vs. 3.48 ± 0.06 sec, p >.05), AT (CON vs. ILP vs. IKLP, 3.56 ± 0.10 vs. 3.57 ± 0.09 vs. 3.58 ± 0.08 sec, p >.05), and TT (CON vs. ILP vs. IKLP, 21.40 ± 0.64 vs. 21.44 ± 0.58 vs. 21.50 ± 0.49 sec, p > .05) were found among treatments during RSA test. There were also no significant effects on FT (CON vs. ILP vs. IKLP, 5.29 ± 0.22 vs. 5.26 ± 0.18 vs. 5.30 ± 0.21 sec, p >.05), AT (CON vs. ILP vs. IKLP, 5.39 ± 0.20 vs. 5.37 ± 0.16 vs. 5.43 ± 0.19 sec, p >.05), and TT (CON vs. ILP vs. IKLP, 32.36 ± 1.23 vs. 32.23 ± 1.00 vs. 32.59 ± 1.19 sec, p > .05) among treatments during RCOD test. Conclusion: The ILP and IKLP warm-up activities might result in fatigue, thus unchanging the subsequent RSA and RCOD performances in female soccer players.
Description
Keywords
熱身活動, 活化後增能作用, 改變方向, warm-up, postactivation potentiation, change of direction