動態貼布與機能壓縮服飾對於膝關節影響

Abstract

前言：在現代運動科學領域中如何預防運動傷害、提高關節穩定性以及增強運動表現一直是研究的熱點。其中膝關節的穩定性對運動員的表現和傷害預防尤為重要。當運動員進行運動時，保持膝關節的穩定性不僅可以減少受傷的風險，還可以提升運動表現。因此，許多運動傷害防護員在臨床上常使用膝關節貼紮，希望藉由這種外在的支撐方式，降低運動員受傷或再度受傷的可能性。目的：本研究旨在比較裸腳、動態貼布和壓縮服裝對膝關節穩定性的影響。方法：本研究招募25名受試者，性別不拘且具有運動習慣者，受試者必須為過去半年內的下肢膝蓋沒有受傷。使用關節穩定度計來測試受試者股骨和脛骨之間的位移狀況，以判斷膝關節穩定性。試驗順序如下：受試者被隨機分配穿戴動態貼布、壓縮服飾或裸腳。在每種狀態下，受試者的小腿近端會在89、134、150、200及250牛頓的設定下分別推壓3次，以計算其脛骨粗隆的平均位移數值，並於實驗結束後填寫舒適度問卷。結果：重複量數變異數分析顯示，壓縮服飾在89、134、150、200及250五種壓力值下均優於動態貼布和裸腳（P< 0.05）。結論：壓縮服飾提供膝關節穩定性，減少位移，選擇穿戴裝備時需平衡支撐性與舒適度選擇適合自身的穿戴條件。

Background: In the field of modern sports science, the prevention of sports injuries, enhancement of joint stability, and improvement of athletic performance have always been hot topics of research. Among these, knee joint stability is particularly crucial for both athletic performance and injury prevention. When athletes engage in sports, maintaining knee joint stability not only reduces the risk of injury but also enhances their performance. Therefore, many sports injury prevention specialists often use knee taping in clinical practice, hoping that this external support can lower the likelihood of injury or re-injury for athletes. Purpose: This study aims to compare the effects of barefoot, dynamic tape, and compression garments on knee joint stability. Methods: The study recruited 25 participants, regardless of gender, who have regular exercise habits and have not sustained any lower limb knee injuries in the past six months. A joint stability measurement device was used to test the displacement between the femur and tibia of the participants, thereby assessing knee joint stability. The experimental sequence was as follows: participants were randomly assigned to wear dynamic tape, compression garments, or go barefoot. In each condition, the proximal end of the participant's lower leg was pressed three times at settings of 89, 134, 150, 200, and 250 Newtons to calculate the average displacement of the tibial tuberosity, and a comfort questionnaire was completed at the end of the experiment. Results: The dynamic tape did not perform as well as expected. Compression garments were superior to barefoot, and barefoot was superior to dynamic tape. Repeated measures ANOVA showed that compression garments were superior to both dynamic tape and barefoot at all five pressure settings of 89, 134, 150, 200, and 250 Newtons (P< 0.05). Conclusion: For the general public, dynamic tape is easy to obtain but difficult to apply correctly. Considering various aspects, compression garments can replace dynamic tape, providing knee joint stability and reducing displacement.