試析〈聲無哀樂論〉之玄理

dc.contributor.author謝大寧zh_tw
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-27T15:42:56Z
dc.date.available2014-10-27T15:42:56Z
dc.date.issued1997-03-??zh_TW
dc.description.abstract嵇康的「聲無哀樂論」一直是中國音樂美學,也是道家美學的一篇重要文獻,但歷來的詮釋者,似乎均未能將此文之樂理和道家之玄理作緊密之扣合,致使此文的詮釋始終存在著不小的漏洞。本文之作,即旨在嘗試以中國音樂美學中「聲、音、樂」三分的結構,來指出嵇康此文思路的滑轉;其中最重要者,尤在「和」這一概念上所出現的歧義。筆者在指出此一歧義之餘,並嘗試以「境界之和」這一概念,作為此文之義理歸宿,以為稽康思想之詮釋更進一解。zh_tw
dc.description.abstractThe essay “聲無哀樂論” by Zhi-kan (稽康) has long been established as a milestone in Chinese acoustic aesthetics and Taoist aesthetics. But so proposed in this essay and the Taoist wisdom, hence missing the proper appreciation of this important essay. I try to formulate here a synthesis of the trilateral property of Chinese acoustic aesthetics, namely “sound, voice-quality, music” “harmony”. In other words, while resorting to this bifurcation and making “the harmony of higher order” (境界之和 the center point of this essay, I also believe a better understanding of its is under way.en_US
dc.identifierD081F23D-539B-7AC0-FF19-F553C4EBC880zh_TW
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/25040
dc.language中文zh_TW
dc.publisher國文學系zh_tw
dc.publisherDepartment of Chinese, NTNUen_US
dc.relation(18),159-173zh_TW
dc.relation.ispartof中國學術年刊zh_tw
dc.subject.other和聲zh_tw
dc.subject.other和聲無象zh_tw
dc.subject.other聲音樂三分zh_tw
dc.subject.other自然之和zh_tw
dc.subject.other境界之和zh_tw
dc.subject.otherHarmonyen_US
dc.subject.otherHarmony is heantonomyen_US
dc.subject.otherThe trilateral property of "sounden_US
dc.subject.otherroice-qualithen_US
dc.subject.othermusic"en_US
dc.subject.otherThe harmony of natureen_US
dc.subject.otherThe harmony of higher orderen_US
dc.title試析〈聲無哀樂論〉之玄理zh-tw

Files