無我而無物非我：呂惠卿《莊子義》中的無我論
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2013-09-??
Authors
林明照
Lin, Ming-chao
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
國文系
Department of Chinese, NTNU
Department of Chinese, NTNU
Abstract
本文集中於就呂惠卿《莊子義》的無我論進行分析，以呈現呂氏詮《莊》的意旨及關注。呂氏在詮《莊》中所展現的無我論題，主要關涉了幾個層面：首先，呂氏對於自我認同的基礎進行了細膩的解析，以此作為無我的實踐前提；其次，在無我的實踐進路上，呂氏提出反思自我形構的來由，以及層層遣除以達自然回應的忘境的修養工夫；再者，在無我的境界意義及政治實踐面向上，呂氏關注治世心靈對於性命之理的了解及順應，以此作為無為治道的基礎；同時氣運環轉所展現出的生命活力及就此把握的價值創造，更是呂氏理想的治世心靈所應當具有的形上智慧以及身心情境。呂氏詮《莊》既有契合《莊子》哲學意旨之處，更有其創造性的詮釋觀點，而這含蘊了其對於時代課題及個人政治實踐的哲學性詮解。
This essay focuses on analyzing Lu Hui-Qing’s thought about “non-self” in Commentary on Zhuangzi. There are some dimensions about the discussion of “non-self” in the book. First, Lu analyzed how one builds self-identity and realizing it is the basis of spiritual transformation into “non-self” in his idea. Second, about how the spiritual state transforms into the ideal state of “non-self”, Lu emphasized the reflection of self-identity and progressive forgetting. With it, one will finally reach the ideal state of response, just spontaneous like a mirror. Third, about the ideal state of “non-self” and the ability form it in governing, Lu gave his attention to how the ruler governs his people with the way of wu-wei, which means following the nature of his people. The ruler should have indispensable metaphysical wisdom and ideal spiritual state which are dynamic life and creativity in culture from Qi. Lu’s interpretation in Zhuangzi are both incisive and creative, and it shows his individual experience in time and political practice.
This essay focuses on analyzing Lu Hui-Qing’s thought about “non-self” in Commentary on Zhuangzi. There are some dimensions about the discussion of “non-self” in the book. First, Lu analyzed how one builds self-identity and realizing it is the basis of spiritual transformation into “non-self” in his idea. Second, about how the spiritual state transforms into the ideal state of “non-self”, Lu emphasized the reflection of self-identity and progressive forgetting. With it, one will finally reach the ideal state of response, just spontaneous like a mirror. Third, about the ideal state of “non-self” and the ability form it in governing, Lu gave his attention to how the ruler governs his people with the way of wu-wei, which means following the nature of his people. The ruler should have indispensable metaphysical wisdom and ideal spiritual state which are dynamic life and creativity in culture from Qi. Lu’s interpretation in Zhuangzi are both incisive and creative, and it shows his individual experience in time and political practice.