國中學術性向資優生父母教養方式與領導才能關係及其相關因素之研究
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2014
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
本研究旨在探討學術性向資優生父母教養方式與領導才能之相關情形，研究對象為就讀臺北市、新北市、基隆市國中學術性向資優班學生共515人，以調查法使用「子女知覺父母教養方式量表」及「領導技能問卷」為研究工具。運用描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關及逐步多元迴歸分析等方法進行統計。研究結果發現如下：
一、「性別」變項在父親教養方式上未達顯著差異，在母親教養方式中，疏於管教及忽視敵意達顯著差異，在領導技能問卷中，書寫溝通技巧達顯著差異。
二、「出生序」變項在父親及母親教養方式上未達顯著差異，在領導技能問卷中，書寫溝通技巧及口語溝通技巧達顯著差異。
三、「幹部經驗」變項在父親教養方式中，疏於管教及開明自主達顯著差異，在母親教養方式中，疏於管教達顯著差異，領導技能問卷九個分量表皆為有幹部經驗顯著高於沒有幹部經驗。
四、「家庭社會地位」變項在父親及母親教養方式上未達顯著差異，在領導技能問卷中，領導基本概念、書寫溝通技巧、口語溝通技巧、團體動力技巧、個人特質、計畫技巧等六個分量表達顯著差異。
五、父母開明自主教養方式與領導才能呈現顯著正相關，疏於管教及忽視敵意教養方式與領導才能呈現顯著負相關。
六、父母教養方式對領導才能有預測力，開明自主教養方式與領導才能得到正向預測，疏於管教及溺愛保護教養方式與領導才能得到負向預測。
最後，依據上述結論提供建議予教育人員、家長及未來研究者參考。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between parenting styles and leadership of scholastic gifted students. Samples were 515 scholastic gifted students in junior high school of Taipei City, New Taipei City and Keelung City. Research tools were Perception of Parenting Style Scale and Leadership Development Program(LDP). The data obtained was analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson’s product-moment correlation, and stepwise multiple regression analysis. The results of this study were as follows: 1. In terms of gender, there were no significant differences on fathers’ parenting styles. However, there were significant differences on nonintervention and neglecting hostility in mothers’ parenting styles, and written communication skills in LDP. 2. In terms of birth order, there were no significant differences on parenting styles. However, there were significant differences on written communication skills and speech communication skills in LDP. 3. In terms of leading experiences, there were significant differences on parenting styles and LDP. 4. In terms of social status of family, there were no significant differences on parenting styles. However, there were significant differences in following 6 scales from LDP: fundamentals of leadership, written communication skills, speech communication skills, group dynamic skills, personal skills and planning skills. 5. There were significant positive correlation between democracy parenting styles and leadership. However, there were significant negative correlations between nonintervention and neglecting hostility in parenting styles and leadership. 6. Parenting styles could be used to predict leadership. Democracy parenting styles could be positively predicted leadership, and nonintervention and indulgence could be negatively predicted leadership. Finally, according to the above results of this study, some suggestions were offered to educational personnel, parents and the future researchers.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between parenting styles and leadership of scholastic gifted students. Samples were 515 scholastic gifted students in junior high school of Taipei City, New Taipei City and Keelung City. Research tools were Perception of Parenting Style Scale and Leadership Development Program(LDP). The data obtained was analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson’s product-moment correlation, and stepwise multiple regression analysis. The results of this study were as follows: 1. In terms of gender, there were no significant differences on fathers’ parenting styles. However, there were significant differences on nonintervention and neglecting hostility in mothers’ parenting styles, and written communication skills in LDP. 2. In terms of birth order, there were no significant differences on parenting styles. However, there were significant differences on written communication skills and speech communication skills in LDP. 3. In terms of leading experiences, there were significant differences on parenting styles and LDP. 4. In terms of social status of family, there were no significant differences on parenting styles. However, there were significant differences in following 6 scales from LDP: fundamentals of leadership, written communication skills, speech communication skills, group dynamic skills, personal skills and planning skills. 5. There were significant positive correlation between democracy parenting styles and leadership. However, there were significant negative correlations between nonintervention and neglecting hostility in parenting styles and leadership. 6. Parenting styles could be used to predict leadership. Democracy parenting styles could be positively predicted leadership, and nonintervention and indulgence could be negatively predicted leadership. Finally, according to the above results of this study, some suggestions were offered to educational personnel, parents and the future researchers.
Description
Keywords
資優生, 國中資優生, 學術性向資優生, 父母教養方式, 領導才能, gifted student, gifted students in junior high school, scholastic gifted students, parenting styles, leadership