理學院
Permanent URI for this communityhttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/3
學院概況
理學院設有數學系、物理學系、化學系、生命科學系、地球科學系、資訊工程學系6個系（均含學士、碩士及博士課程），及科學教育研究所、環境教育研究所、光電科技研究所及海洋環境科技就所4個獨立研究所，另設有生物多樣性國際研究生博士學位學程。全學院專任教師約180人，陣容十分堅強，無論師資、學術長現、社會貢獻與影響力均居全國之首。
特色理學院位在國立臺灣師範大學分部校區內，座落於臺北市公館，佔地約10公頃，是個小而美的校園，內含國際會議廳、圖書館、實驗室、天文臺等完善設施。
理學院創院已逾六十年，在此堅固基礎上，理學院不僅在基礎科學上有豐碩的表現，更在臺灣許多研究中獨占鰲頭，曾孕育出五位中研院院士。近年來，更致力於跨領域研究，並在應用科技上加強與業界合作，院內教師每年均取得多項專利，所開發之商品廣泛應用於醫、藥、化妝品、食品加工業、農業、環保、資訊、教育產業及日常生活中。
在科學教育研究上，臺灣師大理學院之排名更高居世界第一，此外更有獨步全臺的科學教育中心，該中心就中學科學課程、科學教與學等方面從事研究與推廣服務；是全國人力最充足，設備最完善，具有良好服務品質的中心。
在理學院紮實、多元的研究基礎下，學生可依其性向、興趣做出寬廣之選擇，無論對其未來進入學術研究領域、教育界或工業界工作，均是絕佳選擇。
Browse
5 results
Search Results
Item 探討學生線上探究表現與其科學認識信念及科學學習自我效能感間的關係(2023) 邱柏修; Chiu, Po-Hsiu本研究根據108課綱的學習表現架構表中的探究能力設計相關的探究情境問題，並以線上形式的評量進行測驗，降低學生在實驗室中操作的困難度，以了解學生在探究活動中的思考表現。探究活動以學生為知識建構主體，因此學生投入活動的參與程度與意願高低會影響探究表現；學生在建構知識的過程中，會受到其具有的科學認識信念影響，因此本研究使用科學學習自我效能感問卷與新編科學認識信念問卷進行相關性的分析。研究結果表明，學生於線上探究活動中的表現，在「假設階段」、「實驗階段」的表現較佳，而「論證階段」、「反思與建模階段」平均得分率較低。從不同的分組分析中發現，性別差異與探究表現無關，文理組間的差異來自於被歸類於理組的醫護類學生分數較高所致，而同為理組的理工類則與文組學生表現無顯著差異。從相關性分析中發現，探究表現與科學學習自我效能感及科學認識信念皆有相關。在科學學習自我效能感與探究表現的相關性分析中，實踐行動維度與探究表現的關聯在各分組情況下皆有顯示，而不同分組的相關模式也略有差異。在科學認識信念與探究表現的相關性分析中，當學生具有傾向建構主義的科學認識信念時，其探究表現也會較好。Item 地球科學標準化測驗之解題歷程：眼動研究分析(2017) 陳俐陵; Chen, Li-Ling本研究以地球科學為研究範疇，篩選具鑑別度的學科能力測驗試題，根據Bloom認知分類為記憶、理解、應用、分析等四層次問題，透過眼動儀紀錄，並配合晤談與問卷資料，呈現選擇題型標準化測驗解題歷程，探討其與解題表現、解題策略之間的關係，以及科學認識觀在解題歷程的影響性。本研究將45名大專生以上受測者依據成績分為低、中、高三組，分析各組於各層次問題的眼動資料或科學認識觀量表、解題晤談的表現，並討論研究變項間關係。研究結果發現依不同成績分組後，除低分組於記憶題說明區與選項區的再閱讀凝視時間明顯較長與回視次數多外，中分組於理解層次題的許多眼動指標數值亦顯著較高，但高分組於應用或分析題等高階認知層次之說明區的眼動指標數值均較其他兩組低，顯示高分組並未在此層次解題時比其他兩組受測者耗時於瞭解題意上；且解題表現與眼動資料代表之解題歷程相關分析顯示，成績越高者與各區域多項眼動指標數值呈現負相關的趨勢。而各組間的科學認識觀各向度並無顯著差異，僅驗證向度與解題凝視時間百分比接近顯著相關。由於測驗試題的題幹區域內容多半屬於概念提示或條件限定的描述，作答資訊多集中於選項區，故受測者大多採取逆向解題策略，僅應用計算題採順向解題策略。一般而言，高分組具有較高比例受測者的概念正確性程度高、解題表現最佳，但在個別單題計算解題時，中分組的概念正確程度最高、解題表現亦較佳。本研究結果可作為標準化測驗試題設計參考，並提示教師進行學科知能教學時，應著重於基本知識的建立與理解。Item 探討國中力與壓力單元之科學圖像表徵種類與學生閱讀理解行為及表現(2015) 童士奇; Tung, Shih-Chi本研究的目的旨在分析現行國中自然與生活科技教科書(力與壓力單元)中的科學圖像表徵種類，及探討科學圖像表徵種類、性別差異、科學認識觀與科學圖像表徵閱讀理解之關係。本研究以已學過此單元之國九學生為研究對象，並使用科學圖像表徵理解問卷、科學認識觀問卷來探討學生對科學圖像表徵之閱讀理解情形。 研究結果發現：(1)科學圖像表徵種類，在功能形式與內容形式方面，分別以表徵圖及景物圖為主；(2)在理解不同種類的科學圖像表徵時，學生對「組織/資料圖」及「表徵/理論模式圖」的閱讀行為及理解的表現是較差的，而「解釋/概念圖」及「表徵/景物圖」的閱讀行為及理解的表現是較好的，故閱讀所需時間、認知負荷及理解表現是相關的；(3)閱讀「組織/資料圖」、「表徵/景物圖」及「表徵/多元表徵圖」的閱讀行為具在性別差異；(4)學生的科學認識觀與閱讀「表徵/關係圖」、「表徵/理論模式圖」、「組織/資料圖」、「解釋/概念圖」、「表徵/概念圖」、「表徵/景物圖」、「表徵/多元表徵圖」時之行為與表現有相關。 關鍵字：圖像種類、圖像閱讀、認知負荷、科學認識觀、性別差異Item 以巢狀概念模式探究高中生之科學學習–科學認識觀、後設認知知覺、科學學習概念及其科學評量概念(2009) 李旻憲; Min-Hsien LeeThe purpose of this study was to deeply investigate students’ nested ecology regarding science learning from multidimensional perspectives (i.e., the interrelations among scientific epistemological beliefs, metacognition, conceptions of learning science, and conceptions of science assessment). To this end, this study performed the quantitative method to initially explore the interrelations among scientific epistemological beliefs, metacognitive awareness, and conceptions of learning science. Then, the qualitative method was conducted to deeply investigate the interplays among scientific epistemological beliefs, conceptions of learning science, and conceptions of science assessment and to clarify the nested ecology model. In addition, the role of metacognitive awareness on scientific epistemological beliefs and conceptions of learning science and science assessment were discussed through both quantitative and qualitative results. The quantitative part of the study was conducted with a sampling pool of 240 tenth graders. And, those students’ responses from three questionnaires were used to yield some quantitative indicators (i.e., scientific epistemological beliefs, metacognitive awareness, and conceptions of learning science) and to clarify the interplay between those variables. In general, the quantitative results revealed that students having more sophisticated scientific epistemological beliefs tended to show higher metacognitive awareness while learning science and to express more constructivist-oriented conceptions of learning science. In particular, as long as the students have more sophisticated beliefs about the justification of knowledge; they may tend to express much higher metacognitive awareness and to embrace the constructivist conceptions of learning science. For qualitative part of study, 60 representative students selected from the sampling pool were deeply interviewed about their scientific epistemological beliefs (including beliefs about the nature of knowledge and beliefs about the nature of knowing), conceptions of learning science, and conceptions of science assessment. This study found that most selected students expressed the empiricist beliefs about the nature of knowledge. Through the phenomenographic analyze of selected students’ interview responses, seven categories of conceptions of learning science (i.e., memorizing, preparing for tests, practicing the experiments, the increase of knowledge, applying, understanding, and seeing in a new way) and six categories of conceptions of science assessment (i.e., reproducing knowledge, rehearsing, revealing the learning status, improving learning, applying, and the justification of knowledge) were identified in this study. Moreover, the qualitative results seemed to reveal that, on the one hand, the selected students’ beliefs about the nature of knowing seemed to have greater power to explain students’ conceptions of learning science than their beliefs about the nature of knowledge. On the other hand, their beliefs about the nature of knowledge seemed to more relate to their conceptions of science assessment. This study also implied that students expressing more mature conceptions of learning science tended to hold more cohesive conceptions of science assessment. Furthermore, the qualitative part of this study identified three major forms of students’ nested ecology regarding learning science, that is the complete, partial, and divergent nested ecology. In particular, nearly half of 60 representative students were categorized as the complete nested ecology.Item 高中生對於核能發電爭議之非制式推理思考-兼探網路探究活動之影響(2007) 吳穎沺; Ying-Tien WuAt the 21st century, preparing learners’ ability to deal with socio-scientific issues has been recognized as an important goal for science education. In science education, previous studies regarding learners’ informal reasoning on socio-scientific issues were mainly conducted with qualitative analyses. With 68 tenth graders in Taiwan, this study initially attempted to explore students’ informal reasoning on a socio-scientific issue both qualitatively and quantitatively. In this study, “nuclear power usage” was used as the socio-scientific issue for the participants to reason. The conduct of this study was divided into two phases: the “informal reasoning exploration phase”, mainly examining the relationship between students’ informal reasoning and scientific epistemological beliefs (SEBs) as well as their cognitive structures, and the “on-line searching task phase”, mainly focusing on the effects of different on-line searching activities on students’ informal reasoning. In the first phase, the students’ SEBs were accessed by a questionnaire; the data regarding the students’ cognitive structures were collected by tape-recorded interviews; and, an open-ended questionnaire was utilized to gather the data about the participants’ informal reasoning on nuclear power usage. The findings derived from the first phase imply that learners’ informal reasoning on a socio-scientific issue is, in general, correlated with their SEBs as well as their cognitive structures regarding this issue. Moreover, it was also found that the students’ usage of the “comparing” information processing mode was the best predictor for their informal reasoning quality, while their beliefs about the nature of science knowing was the second best predictor for their informal reasoning quality. Besides, the importance of the richness of students’ cognitive structures on their informal reasoning regarding a socio-scientific issue was also highlighted. In the second phase, by using a quasi-experimental research approach, thirty-three students were assigned to a “guided searching task group”, while thirty-five students were assigned to an “unguided searching task group”. Both the students in the two groups were asked to search relevant information regarding nuclear power usage on the Internet and integrate what they had searched into a report during the period of two classes (100 minutes). However, the students in the un-guided searching task group were asked to search freely, while those in the guided searching task group were provided with a searching guideline. The results of second phase showed that the two groups of students did not show any significant difference on their searching outcomes (p>0.05), but it revealed significant effects of guided on-line searching task on students’ cognitive structure outcomes as well as on their supportive argument construction (p<0.05). However, the guided on-line searching task in this study did not significantly facilitate students’ reasoning quality. Besides, the interaction between students’ SEBs and instructional conditions on students’ searching outcomes as well as on their cognitive structure outcomes was found; also, the interaction between students’ information commitments and instructional condition on students’ cognitive structure outcomes as well as on their informal reasoning outcomes was revealed. It suggests that, when trying to improve students’ informal reasoning ability in Internet-based learning environments, science instructors should pay more attention to the role of learners’ SEBs and the information commitments in their learning outcomes. In sum, the findings in current study did provide more insights into the nature of students’ informal reasoning on a socio-scientific issue, and also showed some initial evidences on the usefulness of on-line searching activities on learners’ informal reasoning on this issue.