阻卻違法學理的性惡本質分析－以合理之惡為例

Abstract

本篇研究包含兩部分：即源自歐陸之阻卻違法理論及我國傳統人性思想中有關性惡本質-合理之惡的辯證。採用性惡辯證本質邏輯分析與論證為研究途徑，亦即在研究態度與觀點上係以西方的阻卻違法學理為出發點，並根據西方學者所建構之理論與文獻作為分析的材料，更重要的是突顯中國人特有的人性與人倫觀，特別是以「合理的惡」補中西方法律學理之不足，而合理之惡係就中國傳統文化思維所強調的人性、人倫，加上西方所強調的民主原則的人道、人權之間的調和。雖然西方所強調的民主原則是服從多數與尊重少數，在法理上更需要有人性與人倫基礎，這四者是性惡本質是否合理化思維訴求的判斷標準，因而同時提供特有的辯證思維模式與架構去解析本文所謂的合理之惡的意義，此為本文可能之創見，其終極目標則祈能為推動理想的司法審判貢獻一己之力。This study consists of two parts: from dialectical about the evil nature of the essence - a reasonable evil the Europe of negates the unlawful theory and traditional Chinese Ideas of Human Nature. The evil nature nature of dialectical logic analysis and demonstration research approach, that is, in research on the attitudes and views of Western negates illegal school grounds as a starting point, and as the analysis of the material according to the theory and literature of Western scholars constructed, more importantly,highlighting the unique Chinese concept of human nature and human relations, especially based on "reasonable evil" lack of complement in Western jurisprudence reasonable, rational evil system emphasized the humanity of traditional Chinese culture, thinking, human relations, together with the West emphasizedreconcile between the democratic principles of humanity and human rights. Although the West have stressed the democratic principle is to obey the most respect for minorities in the legal more need someone the basis of Humanity and people Lun, these four is the evil nature essentially whether rationalization thinking demands the judgment standard, and thus at the same time provide unique dialectical thinking mode and architectureto resolve the so-called reasonable evil significance of this article, for this article may be of Transcend, its ultimate goal is imperative to be able to contribute our efforts to promote the ideal of justice trial.