從教師的觀點探討兒童學習網站之評鑑
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2002-03-??
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
國立台灣師範大學教育學系
Department od Education, NTNU
Department od Education, NTNU
Abstract
本研究目的在探討國小教師對兒童學習網站品質評鑑準則的看法、重要性排序及目前兒童網站設計上企待改進之處,以作為未來國小教師在選擇適當的網站學習資源之參考依據以及網站設計者在設計兒童學習網站之相關建議與參考。本研究採用問卷調查及個別電話訪談的方法蒐集資料,以105位有網站使用經驗的國民小學教師為研究對象,進行問卷調查。研究結果發現國小教師認為兒童學習網站品質評鑑準則有五大類,而其重要性排序依次為內容、介面設計與架構、多媒體特性、回饋與支持、及網站基本資料的描述。
The purpose of this study is to investigate elementary school teachers' opinions about the important criteria for evaluating children's learning websites, the rank of evaluation criteria, and the weaknesses of current children's learning websites. This study also provides suggestions for elementary school teachers to select appropriate learning resources from webs and website designers to implement good children's websites in the future. This study used questionnaire survey and telephone interview methods to collect data. The subjects were 105 elementary school teachers who had experience on using Internet. The research results should, that there are five categories of evaluation criteria viewed by teachers as important indicators. The rank of those evaluation criteria are: (1)content, (2)interface design and structure, (3)multimedia functions, (4)feedback and support, and (5)general information of website.
The purpose of this study is to investigate elementary school teachers' opinions about the important criteria for evaluating children's learning websites, the rank of evaluation criteria, and the weaknesses of current children's learning websites. This study also provides suggestions for elementary school teachers to select appropriate learning resources from webs and website designers to implement good children's websites in the future. This study used questionnaire survey and telephone interview methods to collect data. The subjects were 105 elementary school teachers who had experience on using Internet. The research results should, that there are five categories of evaluation criteria viewed by teachers as important indicators. The rank of those evaluation criteria are: (1)content, (2)interface design and structure, (3)multimedia functions, (4)feedback and support, and (5)general information of website.