國民運動中心使用者健康促進生活型態現況調查之研究

Abstract

本研究目的在瞭解運動中心使用者之健康促進生活型態現況，了解社會人口、自覺健康狀況與健康促進生活型態三者間的相互影響，並進一步探討健康促進生活型態之預測因子。 運動中心使用者為研究母群體，採橫斷式調查法，利用自填問卷方式進行資料收集，發出問卷500份，共回收476份，回收率95.2%，有效問卷434份，有效問卷回收率91.2%。以SPSS 22.0 電腦統計軟體進行資料建檔與分析，統計結果歸納如下： 一.自覺健康狀態標準化得分64.73分，約中等程度；有八成五以上的人覺得跟同年齡的人比，自己的健康普通好；有七成五的人覺得比起前半年，自己的健康比普通好，有將進九成的人覺得整體而言，自己的健康比普通好。 二.健康促進生活型態標準化得分69.83分，約中等程度；六分項得分高到低分依序為飲食營養、壓力管理、人際支持、自我實現、運動行為、健康責任。 三.研究對象之社會人口學中的性別、年齡、有無運動習慣、每周運動時間對自覺健康狀態有顯著差異。 四.研究對象之社會人口學中的婚姻、有無運動習慣、每周運動時間對健康促進生活型態有顯著差異。 五.自覺健康狀態與健康促進生活型態呈現顯著正相關，顯示自覺健康狀態得分高，則健康促進生活形態越好。 六.以性別、每周運動時間、自覺健康狀態，三個預測因子可有效預測健康促進生活型態，可以解釋健康促進生活型態總變異量的19.8%。The purpose of this study was to investigate the status of health promotion lifestyle who used in civil sports center. To explore the relationship between the social population, self-perceived health status and the status of health promotion lifestyle with each other. And further discussed the status of health promotion predictive factor. This study object were taken from the users whom used civil sports center by cross-sectional study. Collected data by self-administered questionnaire. Questionnaire were passed through five hundred cases and four hundred seventy-six cases were returned. The return rate is 95.2%. And the efficiency questionnaire return four hundred thirty-four cases, efficiency questionnaire rate was 91.2%. All data and frequency distribution were performed with the SPSS 22.0. Significant results were as followed:

1.Self-perceived health status standard point was 64.73 approaches intermediate; Above eighty-five percent respondents feels their healthy compare with the same age is common status; Seventy-five percent respondents feels their healthy compare with six months ago is common status; Near ninety-five percent respondents feels their Self-perceived health status was better than common status. 2.Health promotion lifestyle standard point was 64.73 approaches intermediate; Six items sequence by points was “Nutrition”, ”Pressure management” ,” Interpersonal support” ,” Self – actualization” , “Exercise” , “Health responsibility”. 3.There were significant difference between the factors such us “gender”,” age”, exercise” habit”, ” exercise hours per week “from self-perceived health status. 4.There were significant difference between the factors such us “marital status”, “exercise habit “,” exercise hours per week “from health promotion lifestyle. 5.The” self-perceived health status” and “health promotion lifestyle” had a significant positive correlation in the relationship. It showed a presentation the higher “self-perceived health status” points made the “health promotion lifestyle” better. 6.Used “gender”, ” exercise hours per week”,” self-perceived health status” this three variables to predict “health promotion lifestyle” could be explain” health promotion lifestyle” population variance was nineteen point eight percent.