編織多重歷史記憶：解嚴以來通俗類型小說如何再現二二八

Abstract

二二八事件距今七十餘載，依舊為人所爭論。雖然二二八小說隨政治體制改變而增加，但在文學方面的研究，多以嚴肅文學的討論為基準。本論文試圖挖掘嚴肅文學之外的二二八小說，並藉由文學社會學的視野，關注言情、BL （Boys’ Love）與奇幻的通俗小說如何運用該類型特色再現二二八事件。 本文分為三個部分：第二章言情（《成灰亦相思》）、第三章BL（《再見，東京》）及第四章奇幻（《朝顏時光》跟《戰後五七八天》）進行文化分析。每章先探討內部文本分析，從書寫策略（敘事結構、人物形象、書寫主題）以及歷史記憶（地景描繪、空間移動、身分認同）進行深度詮釋。藉此勾勒出該類型特色所展演的美學特質，並也探討記憶與空間敘事如何形構過去的歷史想像。接著為外部結構分析，脈絡化解讀各類型的發展史，也佐以出版社的變遷過程共同參照，再從創作動機跟讀者回饋著手，觀察文本如何被定位。 綜觀本文，透過文學社會學的視野，讓內部文本以及外部結構產生對話，展現通俗小說與二二八結合的可能性，勾勒出二二八小說的多元圖像。並考察長期以來隱藏在臺灣文學中的「雅俗位階」問題，試圖重新詮釋通俗小說所蘊藏卻被忽視的主體性。The February 28 Incident (also known as the 228 Incident) occurred nearly seventy years ago, it is still being debated in Taiwan. Although the amount of 228 fictions has been increasing with the transfer of political system, literary studies are mostly based on serious literature discussions. Except for the serious literature, this study intends to discuss how romance, BL (Boys’ Love) and fantasy reproduce the 228 Incident through the perspective of sociology of literature. This study will be divided into three parts by using cultural analysis: Second chapter is about romance, third chapter is about BL and fourth chapter is about fantasy. First, each chapter starts with textual analysis, then focuses on external operations. In textual analysis, this study will discuss about writing strategies (narrative, character, theme) and historical memories (landscape, space, identity). In this way, this study not only to reveal the aesthetic of fictions, but also show us how memories and space narrative shape the historical imagination. In external operations, this study will explain the development context of popular literature and publishers, then organize the creative motivation and reader’s feedback to observe the position of the text. This paper will discuss the interaction between internal text and external structure through the perspective of literary sociology. It shows the possibility of combining popular literature with 228 Incident, and outlines the multiple images of 228 fictions. In addition, using this as an entry point to examine the problems implied in Taiwanese literature, trying to reinterpret the subjectivity in popular literature but it neglected.