我國警察警察人員執行路檢與人權保障之研究

Abstract

隨著國際人權思潮的澎湃，我國政府、民間均日益強調人權保障的理念與政策。尤其，歷年來我國經常耳聞因為警察人員執行路檢勤務不當，而與民眾發生糾紛，影響人民對警察的觀感，間接影響對政府的評價，而警察人員使用強制力，特別是代表國家行使公權力的「路檢」勤務對於民眾的人權保障影響最為直接與密切。因此，警察的執行力是否能在高績效的表現下，又能符合人民對於人權保障的期待。實為值得注意的課題。本研究主要探討我國警察執行「路檢」勤務的過程，是否有違反人權保障？因此，本文將釐清保障人權應有之作為並提出改進建議，提供警察機關實施「路檢」勤務之參考。本文主要以「訪談法」進行研究，以隨機抽樣方式對7名警察人員、10名一般民眾及遴選2名專家學者進行訪談，並將訪談內容加以整理、分析；輔以相關文獻進行研究與比較，並從法規面及實務面做檢視。期許本研究建議，能提供警察機關修訂「路檢」相關規定及改進「路檢」勤務執行之參考，以達到兼顧維護治安與人權保障的理想。With the rise of conceptions of international human right, governments and people both have emphasized the idea and the policy of human right. In particular, in Taiwan, there have been many arguments happened between police officers and the public from the news reports.This definitely has negative impacts on the image of police officers, nence affects people's evaluation to the government. Whenever Police officers use their coercive power, especially when performing“road check” in the name of the government, it may affect the human right of citizens directly. Is it likely if police officers can meet people's expectation toward human right while practising road check？That is, this is an important issue. Therefore, this study mainly focuses on the issue if the police officers violate human right protection when performing road check.The paper will clarify the scheme for protecting human right,and provides som suggestions for police administration to refer when performing road check. The research adopted “Interview”as tool to survey seven police officers randomly select, ten citizens and two selected scholars. The contents of interview had been filed and analyzed afterwards; it had been compared with relative literature and inspected from both the perspective of regulations and practice as well. It is expected that suggestions of this research may provide police administration relative regulations and revise for road check to reach the intention of both public security and human right protection.