青少年對家族主義認知之研究

Abstract

本研究旨在探討青少年的家族主義認知，及個人背景與家庭變項之影響。研究採問卷調查法，採葉明華與楊國樞（1997）的「家族主義量表－認知層次」，選擇青少年階段之高中和高職學生為對象，以「分層」的方式，非隨機取得有效樣本數603份。主要研究發現如下： 1.本研究之青少年過半皆沒有宗教的信仰，並且父母多為已婚同住， 屬於低社經地位的家庭。 2.青少年對家族主義認知程度傾向有點同意，其中以「團結和諧」此 一面向的認同程度最高，意指個人願意接受維持家庭團結、和諧的 重要性；其次分別為「興盛家道」、「繁延家族」。 3.「性別」、「學校類別」、「父母婚姻狀況」對於家族主義認知有 顯著的預測力。男性、高職學生並且父母同住在一起之青少年，家 族主義的認知程度傾向較高。 4.本研究測量的個人背景因素皆對家族主義認知有顯著影響；在家庭 變項中，唯父母婚姻狀況對青少年家族主義認知有顯著影響。 最後，根據研究結果，分別針對青少年、父母、學校以及未來研究四方面提出具體建議。The purpose of this study is to explore the attitude to the familism of adolescents, and discuss the effect of demographic variables. A questionnaire survey was conducted on senior and vocational high school students in Taiwan. Looked into the research done by Yang and Yeh (1997) and adopted its questionnaire “Chinese Familism－Cognitive Component” for measuring the attitude to the familism of senior and vocational high school students. The effective samples which were acquired through stratified sampling for non-random are 603. The major findings are presented as follows： 1.More than fifty percent of the study samples are unreligious. Additionally, over half of the sample comes from low social economic status family, and approximately ninety percent of the study sample reflected their parents were married and lived together. 2.The senior and vocational high school students were little inclined to agree the familism. The respondents believe the “ beliefs in Solidarity and Harmony ” the most. That means they must accept and maintain the importance of solidarity and harmony in family. Followed by the “Family Prosperity” and “Lineage Prolongation and Expansion” 3.On the whole, “gender”、“school type” and “parents” marriage status” had significant effect on the familism. In other words, men held more high familism than the women; The vocational high school students held more high familism than the senior high school students. Furthermore, students live with parents together were a strong and positive predictor of the familism. 4.In this study, the individual variables effect on adolescents familism were significant. On the other hand, Only parents’ marriage status of the family variables were more important predictors. According to the findings, suggestions for adolescents, parents, schools and future researches are addressed.