地方政府競技運動發展策略之比較研究—以臺北市及新北市為例
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2013
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
檢視國內競技運動相關研究,多偏重在國家層級,然而從中央與地方政府年度預算比例來看,地方政府在我國競技運動發展上亦扮演重要角色。基於此本研究欲探討臺北市與新北市競技運動發展策略,並比較其異同點及討論分析依據之適用性。
本研究採質性研究法,透過編輯式分析法及半結構式訪談,分析與比較臺北市與新北市競技運動發展策略。並以梁曉龍等 (2005,2006) 提出的中國舉國體制基本體系所提十二項基本體系作為分析之依據。
研究發現臺北市與新北市政府競技運動發展策略,在體育 (競技運動) 行政組織、國際體育 (競技運動) 交流、競技運動經費來源與運用、基層競技運動選手養成學校、優秀競技運動選手培訓制度、競技運動專業訓練站 (中心) 、競技運動相關獎勵措施,其相關規劃、措施與發展方向是相似與雷同的,而競技運動競賽分級制度則以新北市略勝一籌。有關競技運動科學與資訊單位、競技運動藥檢機構、競技運動選手教育制度、競技運動退役人員保障制度,則是兩直轄市需要加強與較為不足的地方。在分析依據適用性部分,使用梁曉龍等 (2005,2006) 提出的十二項基本體系分析與比較地方政府 (臺北市與新北市) 競技運動發展策略,並無適用上的困難,惟在使用科技和信息服務系統及反興奮劑系統,則與地方政府競技運動發展策略的實際面,有使用或運用上的落差。
最後對體育 (競技運動) 行政組織的發展與變革、國際體育 (競技運動) 交流發展、競技運動競賽分級制度的規劃與發展、競技運動專業訓練站、科學與資訊及藥檢單位的設置、競技運動相關獎勵措施、備戰全國運動會及2017世界大學運動會等,提出相關建議與省思,以及對未來研究提出建議方向。
In viewing related domestic studies of elite sports, most of them focus on elite sports of national level; however, from the view of central and local government’s annual budget ratio, local government also plays an important role on the development of elite sports. This study analyzes and compares the development strategies of elite sports of both Taipei City and New Taipei City, and at the same time examines the applicability of the strategies. Qualitative research method is conducted in this research. Through the methods of editing analysis and semi-structured interview, the study examines and compares Taipei City and New Taipei City’s development strategies. In addition, this study uses Liang, Bao, and Zhang’s (2005, 2006) twelve contents of whole country support for the elite sports system as guideline for analysis. The study finds out that Taipei City and New Taipei City’s development strategies are similar in the following factors: elite sport administration organization, international sports exchanges, elite sports funding sources and usages, elite sport athletes training schools, outstanding elite sport athletes training system, professional elite sport training centers, elite sport related reward measurements, and their related planning, means as well as development orientation. Yet, New Taipei city has a better elite sport classify system. However, both cities need to set up elite sport science and information departments, anti-doping systems, elite sport athletes’ educational systems, and retired elite sport athletes’ service programs. In analyzing the adopted applicability, there is no difficulty applying Liang et al.’s (2005, 2006) twelve contents of whole country support for the elite sports system to analyze and compare the local governments’ (Taipei City and New Taipei City) elite sport development strategies. Yet, there is usage and employing discrepancy in technology and communication serve systems and anti-doping systems with local government elite sport development strategies actual practices. In the finally part of the study, for the preparation for future National Games and 2017 Universiade, this study brings forward the suggestions and reflections on the development strategies of elite sport of local governments. Besides, this study also proposes directions for future studies.
In viewing related domestic studies of elite sports, most of them focus on elite sports of national level; however, from the view of central and local government’s annual budget ratio, local government also plays an important role on the development of elite sports. This study analyzes and compares the development strategies of elite sports of both Taipei City and New Taipei City, and at the same time examines the applicability of the strategies. Qualitative research method is conducted in this research. Through the methods of editing analysis and semi-structured interview, the study examines and compares Taipei City and New Taipei City’s development strategies. In addition, this study uses Liang, Bao, and Zhang’s (2005, 2006) twelve contents of whole country support for the elite sports system as guideline for analysis. The study finds out that Taipei City and New Taipei City’s development strategies are similar in the following factors: elite sport administration organization, international sports exchanges, elite sports funding sources and usages, elite sport athletes training schools, outstanding elite sport athletes training system, professional elite sport training centers, elite sport related reward measurements, and their related planning, means as well as development orientation. Yet, New Taipei city has a better elite sport classify system. However, both cities need to set up elite sport science and information departments, anti-doping systems, elite sport athletes’ educational systems, and retired elite sport athletes’ service programs. In analyzing the adopted applicability, there is no difficulty applying Liang et al.’s (2005, 2006) twelve contents of whole country support for the elite sports system to analyze and compare the local governments’ (Taipei City and New Taipei City) elite sport development strategies. Yet, there is usage and employing discrepancy in technology and communication serve systems and anti-doping systems with local government elite sport development strategies actual practices. In the finally part of the study, for the preparation for future National Games and 2017 Universiade, this study brings forward the suggestions and reflections on the development strategies of elite sport of local governments. Besides, this study also proposes directions for future studies.
Description
Keywords
策略, 競技運動, 關鍵因子, 舉國體制, strategy, elite sport, sport policy factors, whole country support for the elite sports system