TRIZ法應用於設計造形發想-以有效動 作連續性為例

dc.contributor梁桂嘉zh_TW
dc.contributorLiang, Kuei-Chiaen_US
dc.contributor.author戴詠家zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorTai, Yung-Chiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-05T03:05:34Z
dc.date.available2021-06-30
dc.date.available2019-09-05T03:05:34Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstract設計需要不斷地創新思考才衍生新的概念,為了激發設計思考,如今發展出許 多設計方法。TRIZ 法為其中一種,本研究選擇 TRIZ 法其中一創新原則-有效動 作連續性深入探討,採用案例分析作為研究方法,挑選近年來國際設計比賽中獲 獎作品作為研究案例。經過兩階段的案例分析,符合本次研究的共有 55 項案例, 由案例研究的結果歸納出:1.有效動作連續性中的部分參數(例如耐久度、效率) 屬於不可見參數,根據研究結果,較不適合應用於設計領域中。2.根據研究,原 先有效動作連續性的三項特性屬於工業工程,應用於設計發想必須經過調整。3. 研究過程裏,55 項案例在矛盾矩陣的應用比例中,以適應度/力(35/10)應用比 例最高,因此建議未來欲使用有效動作連續性的學生或設計師,可優先從適應度 /力的參數進行設計發想。4.研究結果指出 TRIZ 法矛盾矩陣與創新原則進行工業 設計的可行性相當高,然而並非不能完全的套用,必須將矛盾矩陣的參數與創新 原則的特性與詞彙重新調整得以適用工業設計中,思考流程也能更流暢完整。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractDesigners need to constantly conduct innovative thinking so as to come up with new ideas, so many designing methods have been developed to inspire design thinking. TRIZ method is one of these methods, and in this research, I used one of the creative principles in the TRIZ method: the Continuity of Useful Action to conduct further discussion, with case studies as the research method, in which I chose prize winners in recent international designing competitions as the cases. After two stages of case studies, I found out that 55 cases met the requirements in this research, and from the result I concluded the following: 1. Some parameters in the Continuity of Useful Action, such as degree of durability and efficiency, are invisible parameters, so based on the result it is not quite suitable to apply them in the designing field; 2. Based on this research, three characteristics within the Continuity of Useful Action actually originated from the Industrial Engineering field, so when applying in design thinking they need to be adjusted in advance; 3. During the course of this research, I discovered that among all the parameters, “Adaptability/Force” has the highest application percentage in the Contradiction Matrix, so I suggested that in the future students or designers who wish to apply the Continuity of Useful Action can conduct your design thinking with the parameter of “Adaptability/Force” as the first priority; 4. The research result shows that the feasibility of applying the Contradiction Matrix and the creating principle within the TRIZ method to conduct industrial design is really high, but they cannot be directly applied: the parameters in the Contradiction Matrix and the characteristics and phrases in the creative principle need to be adjusted so as to fit in industrial design, which will make the thinking process more smooth and intact.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship設計學系zh_TW
dc.identifierG060468020T
dc.identifier.urihttp://etds.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&s=id=%22G060468020T%22.&%22.id.&
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:80/handle/20.500.12235/103082
dc.language中文
dc.subjectTRIZ法zh_TW
dc.subject設計思考zh_TW
dc.subject工業設計zh_TW
dc.subjectTRIZ Methoden_US
dc.subjectDesign Thinkingen_US
dc.subjectIndustrial Designen_US
dc.titleTRIZ法應用於設計造形發想-以有效動 作連續性為例zh_TW
dc.titleApplying the TRIZ Method in the design thinking of Appearances: Using Continuity of Useful Action as an Exampleen_US

Files

Collections