不同教學法介入對於高爾夫球初學者擊球桿頭速度之影響 The impact of different teaching intervention on the hitting club head speed for golf beginner

dc.contributor 張家豪 zh_TW
dc.contributor Jia-Hao Chang en_US
dc.contributor.author 楊文添 zh_TW
dc.contributor.author Wen- Tien Yang en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2019-09-05T07:16:59Z
dc.date.available 2012-8-1
dc.date.available 2019-09-05T07:16:59Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.description.abstract 不同教學法介入對於高爾夫球初學者擊球桿頭速度之影響 中文摘要 2008.6.17 中文摘要 研 究 生:楊文添 指導教授:張家豪 摘要 目的:探討棒球投球、網球拍揮拍、傳統高爾夫多球等三種不同教學方法介入對於高爾夫球初學者在實驗教學前、後高爾夫揮桿擊球桿頭瞬間速度之差異。方法:本研究採集群抽樣法,以台北市某科技學院高爾夫興趣選課四個班級之學生,共計73人,採抽籤方式分派一班為棒球投球練習組(18人)、一班為網球拍揮拍練習組(21人)、一班為傳統高爾夫多球練習組(18人)、一班為對照組(16人),各組實施不同教學方法介入課程中,以相依樣本t考驗檢定組內在前測及後測是否有顯著差異。以獨立樣本單因子變異數分析(One-way ANOVA)檢定各組間的高爾夫揮桿桿頭瞬間速度之差異情況。所有考驗的顯著水準均定為α=.05。結果:經過八週不同教學後,結果顯示網球拍揮拍練習組在教學後比教學前進步4.24±8.72 mph、傳統高爾夫多球練習組在教學後比教學前進步5.54±8.63 mph、棒球投球練習組在教學後比教學前進步4.57±8.00 mph,三組測驗成績皆達顯著進步(p<.05);而對照組經過八週不參與任何運動性質之活動後卻比前測時退步7.22±10.20 mph,測驗成績有顯著退步(p<.05)。四組在接受實驗教學後各組間並未達顯著差異。結論:本研究的三組教學法所強調的皆是以身體旋轉為基礎,而結果顯示,高爾夫揮桿擊球桿頭瞬間速度會因為教學練習而有所進步,因為學習的停頓導致退步。因此,本研究針對高爾夫身體轉動揮桿預使擊球桿頭瞬間速度進步的三種教學法皆屬有效的高爾夫教學法。 zh_TW
dc.description.abstract The impact of different teaching intervention on the hitting club head speed for golf beginner 2008.6.17 英文摘要 Student: Wen- Tien Yang Adviser: Jia-Hao Chang Abstract Purpose: to explore the difference of instantaneous speed of the golf hitting club head before and after three different interventions (baseball pitching, tennis swinging, and traditional golf hitting) for the golf beginners. Method: A total of 73 subjects participated in the study, the subjects were assigned randomly as baseball pitching practice group (N=18), tennis swinging practice group (N=21), and the control group (N=16). Paired t test was used to examine the significant difference of the club head instantaneous speed in the groups before and after the intervention. One-way ANOVA was used to assess the difference of the club head instantaneous speed among the groups. The significance level was set as α=.05. Results: After 8 weeks different training approaches, the results showed the club head speed increased 4.24±8.72 mph in tennis swing training (p<.05), 5.54±8.63 mph in traditional golf training (p<.05), and 4.57±8.00 mph in baseball pitching training (p<.05). However, the club head speed significantly decreased 7.22±10.20 mph in control group (p<.05). No differences of the club head speed were found among the groups. Conclusion: Because of the trunk rotation training by these three interventions, the results showed that all the club head speeds were improved after these training. Therefore, the interventions (tennis swing, golf training, and baseball pitching) in this study were effective approaches for the golf beginner to increase the club head speed. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship 體育學系 zh_TW
dc.identifier GN0095043116
dc.identifier.uri http://etds.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&s=id=%22GN0095043116%22.&%22.id.&
dc.identifier.uri http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:80/handle/20.500.12235/105220
dc.language 中文
dc.subject 不同教學法 zh_TW
dc.subject 介入方法 zh_TW
dc.subject 高爾夫 zh_TW
dc.subject 擊球 zh_TW
dc.subject 桿頭速度 zh_TW
dc.subject different teaching en_US
dc.subject intervention en_US
dc.subject golf en_US
dc.subject hitting en_US
dc.subject club head speed en_US
dc.title 不同教學法介入對於高爾夫球初學者擊球桿頭速度之影響 zh_TW
dc.title The impact of different teaching intervention on the hitting club head speed for golf beginner en_US
Files
Collections