教學活動與空間配置型態之研究

Abstract

本研究旨在探討課程教學型態與教室空間配置模式之發展，並結構以教育理論、學習與教學型態、教學空間的發展等理論基礎，進行具體研究目的探討，其內容包括一、分析教學型態對教室空間配置之影響。二、瞭解開放式學校教室空間配置之型態。三、分析教室區域配置型態與班群規劃模式之型態。四、分析課程統整與教室空間配置之型態。 為達上述研究目的，本研究首先透過文獻分析，瞭解課程統整與教學型態之理論基礎，再針對國內外23所實施開放性教室空間設計之小學，進行學校區域配置型態與教室班群規劃模式之歸納分析，最後再以課程統整與教室內部空間模式進行研究分析。 本研究針對教學型態、教室空間型態提出研究結論如下： 就教學型態而言： 一、 維持傳統班級教學之優點，並重視個別化與個性化之學習活動。 二、 提供教育資源共享的設施與設備。 三、 提供不同的教學方式來協助學習。 就教室空間型態而言： 一、 提供彈性及人性化的教學空間設計。 二、 多樣性的學習群與資源區的設計。 三、 配合統整課程與協同教學之空間需求。 四、 提供資源充沛、設計絕佳的活動套件。 五、 教室配置型態的組合。 六、 教室班群規劃的組合。 七、 課程統整與教室內部空間模式。 本研究最後針對上述之研究結果加以討論，並綜合歸納研究結論，提出有關教學者及空間設計者未來實施與後續研究的建議，以供參考。

The purpose of this research is to explore the development of teaching style and classroom space accommodation. In addition, based on theories such as education theory, development of teaching spaces, to conduct solid research objective discussion. Content includes: 1) To Analyze of the influence of teaching styles to classroom spaces allocation; 2) To understand the space allocation styles of open teaching spaces, 3) To analyze classroom space allocation and classroom group arrangement patterns, 4) To analyze courses integration and classroom space allocation. To meet the above-mentioned research objectives, we conduct literature review to first understand the theoretic background of the integration and pattern of teaching. Afterward, we target at 23 open space elementary schools overseas and locally to perform analysis on their school space allocation and classroom group arrangement. Finally, we conduct research and analysis on courses integration and the in-class space patterns. For teaching styles and classroom style, we propose the following conclusions: 1. Keep the trait of traditional classroom teaching styles with a focus on customized learning activities 2. Provide the equipment and appliances of education resource sharing. 3. Adopt different teaching styles to assist learning. As for classroom space: 1. Provide flexible and humane teaching space design. 2. Wide range of selection of learning group and learning resource design. 3. Cope with course integration and co-teaching to conduct space design. 4. Provide resourceful and quality designed activity tools. 5. Pattern of classroom allocation. 6. Pattern of classroom grouping. 7. Course integration and classroom interior space pattern. The research will discuss on the above-mentioned research results. Based on the conclusions, we propose some suggestion so serve as a reference for related teaching researchers and space designers.