多重夫妻支持性團體模式效果之初探
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2009-10-??
Authors
伍育英
鄭玉英
杜長齡
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
國立臺灣師範大學教育心理學系
Department of Educational Psychology, NTNU
Department of Educational Psychology, NTNU
Abstract
本研究旨在探討多重夫妻支持性團體模式運用在高風險家庭之效果。研究採解釋型混合研究法。第一階段為量化研究，以沈瓊桃編製的「多面向婚姻滿意量表」與自編之「攜手向愛走整體回饋表」為研究工具，研究參與者為13對高風險夫妻與1位太太。第二階段的質性研究，則以內容分析法作為資料分析的架構，分析8對高風險夫妻的深度訪談內容。綜合2階段研究，結果發現（1）高風險夫妻在「彈性程度」、「價值觀」、「親友關係」、「反應心向」與「單面向婚姻滿意」5個向度上，在團體結束時的滿意度，顯著地高於參加團體前的滿意度；（2）「價值觀」、「反應心向」與「子女教養」這3個向度，於團體結束時的滿意度亦顯著地高於團體結束1個月後的滿意度：（3）「單面向婚姻滿意」這個向度，於團體結束時以及團體結束1個月後，其滿意度皆高於參加團體前的滿意度；（4）團體結束1個月後，男性的「親密程度」滿意度顯著的高於女性；（5）團體的療效因子，包括情緒、互動與認知三大因素，其中又以認知因素最被高風險夫妻看重。本研究最後根據研究結果加以討論，並針對實務工作及未來研究提出建議。
The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of multiple couples group therapy applied to the high-risk families. The explanatory mixed method design was used to divide the study into two phases. In Phase 1, quantitative data were collected from 13 couples and 1 wife who completed the "Multi-dimensional Marital Satisfaction Inventory" and the "Together to Love Inventory". In Phase 2, qualitative data were collected from 8 couples' in-depth interviews and analyzed by the method of content analysis. Results indicated that the satisfaction of before-group, after-group and one-month–after group are significantly different for several sub-scales. And the emotional, interactive and conceptive factors composed the group therapeutic factors. Implications for counseling practice and suggestions for future research are discussed.
The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of multiple couples group therapy applied to the high-risk families. The explanatory mixed method design was used to divide the study into two phases. In Phase 1, quantitative data were collected from 13 couples and 1 wife who completed the "Multi-dimensional Marital Satisfaction Inventory" and the "Together to Love Inventory". In Phase 2, qualitative data were collected from 8 couples' in-depth interviews and analyzed by the method of content analysis. Results indicated that the satisfaction of before-group, after-group and one-month–after group are significantly different for several sub-scales. And the emotional, interactive and conceptive factors composed the group therapeutic factors. Implications for counseling practice and suggestions for future research are discussed.