運用 S-P 表分析試題類型及學習表現— 以技術型高中觀光餐旅英語與會話為例
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
本研究研究目的在分析學生測驗觀光餐旅英語的學習類型及診斷學生的學習弱項,用實驗研究(experimental research)「之前實驗設計」,(pre-experimental design)之單組前後測設計(one-group pretest-posttest design)。前測試題選取餐飲科班級進行施參與,前測的內部一致性係數為 .82 具有高信度。後測擴大選取參與測驗的餐飲科學生共計 198 人,透過TESTER for Windows 3.0 版進行試題分析及 S–P 表繪製,研究結果臚列如下:ㄧ、本試題的 Cronbach's alpha 為.93,90%題目為優良試題具有高信度。二、研究分析出學習類型 A-學習穩定型(共計 63 人,佔 31.82% )、A'類型-粗心大意型(共計 19 人,佔 27.78%)、B 類型-努力不足型(共計19 人,佔9.60%)、學習類型B'-欠缺充分型(共計34 人,佔17.17%)具學習弱項 C 型-努力不足型(共計 7 人,佔 3.54%)及 C'型-學習異常型學生共計(共計 19 人,佔 10.10%)。三、研究結果針對學生學習觀光餐旅英語診斷出弱項的結果,未來加以輔導,改善學習習慣等方式;提供一份具有信度及效度的觀光餐旅英語題庫。未來研究建議,未來研究者可以加廣觀光餐旅英語出題的範圍並利用 TESTER for Windows 3.0 版進行試題分析建立觀光餐旅英語題庫,以利現場教學者之參考。
The purpose of the study is to analyze the learning types and diagnosis of student's learning weakness of Tourism and Hospitality English Conversation. The research metood is one-group pretest-posttest design of pre-experimental design of experimental research. The purpose of the study is to analyze the learning types and diagnosis of students' learning weaknesses. A Dept. of Restaurant Management are selected for the pre-test.The cronbach's alpha is .82 of the pre-test, it has high reliability. The post-test is expanded to 198 students from Dept. of Restaurant Management. The test analysis and S-P chart drawing are conducted through TESTER for Windows version 3.0. The cronbach's alpha of The post-test is .93, it has high reliability and transparency.The 90% questions blong to good questions.The study analyze 198 students, and the results are the followings:there are 31.82% ( total of 63 students ) belonged to the high ability and high stability, Type A; there are 27.78% ( total of 55 students ) belonge to the high ability and high stability, Type A'; there are 9.60% ( total of 19 students ) belonged to medium ability and high stability, Type B; there are 17.17% ( total of 34 students ) belonge to medium ability and high stability, Type B'; there are 3.54% ( total of 7 students ) belonged to low ability and high stability, Type C; there are 10.10% ( total of 10 students ) belonge to low ability and low stability, Type C'.To sum up, there are 13.64% ( total of 27 students ); it show that these twenty seven students have learning weakness of Tourism and Hospitality English Conversation. In the future, the teachers provide useful guidance to improve them and problems bank. The suggestions of future study, the future researchers can expand the range of tourism and hospitality English coversation; use TESTER for Windows version 3.0 to analyze exam questions and establish problems bank for teachers.
The purpose of the study is to analyze the learning types and diagnosis of student's learning weakness of Tourism and Hospitality English Conversation. The research metood is one-group pretest-posttest design of pre-experimental design of experimental research. The purpose of the study is to analyze the learning types and diagnosis of students' learning weaknesses. A Dept. of Restaurant Management are selected for the pre-test.The cronbach's alpha is .82 of the pre-test, it has high reliability. The post-test is expanded to 198 students from Dept. of Restaurant Management. The test analysis and S-P chart drawing are conducted through TESTER for Windows version 3.0. The cronbach's alpha of The post-test is .93, it has high reliability and transparency.The 90% questions blong to good questions.The study analyze 198 students, and the results are the followings:there are 31.82% ( total of 63 students ) belonged to the high ability and high stability, Type A; there are 27.78% ( total of 55 students ) belonge to the high ability and high stability, Type A'; there are 9.60% ( total of 19 students ) belonged to medium ability and high stability, Type B; there are 17.17% ( total of 34 students ) belonge to medium ability and high stability, Type B'; there are 3.54% ( total of 7 students ) belonged to low ability and high stability, Type C; there are 10.10% ( total of 10 students ) belonge to low ability and low stability, Type C'.To sum up, there are 13.64% ( total of 27 students ); it show that these twenty seven students have learning weakness of Tourism and Hospitality English Conversation. In the future, the teachers provide useful guidance to improve them and problems bank. The suggestions of future study, the future researchers can expand the range of tourism and hospitality English coversation; use TESTER for Windows version 3.0 to analyze exam questions and establish problems bank for teachers.
Description
Keywords
S–P 表分析法, 觀光餐旅英語, 學習診斷, 學習弱項, 試題係數, 學生學習係數, Student-Problem Chart Analysis, Tourism and Hospitality English Conversation, Learning weaknesses, Learning diagnosis, Caution Index, Disparity Coefficient