朱熹的鬼神觀

dc.contributor國立臺灣師範大學國文學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.author黃瑩暖zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-17T08:49:19Z
dc.date.available2015-11-17T08:49:19Z
dc.date.issued2000-06-01
dc.description.abstract儒學發展至宋代,為了回應佛教思想的衝擊,不得不從現世人生的關注,推及於宇宙起源的探索與生死的思考等問題;其中對鬼神的討論,訂破了孔子以降「不語怪力亂神」的傳統。闢佛最力的朱熹,對鬼神的討論也最多。本文嘗試對朱熹之鬼神觀及其關於祭祀感格的說法作相應的詮應,檢視其理論上的得失,並從儒學的角度看失熹鬼神觀的提出所顯現的意義。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractConfucianism in the Sung Dynasty had turned to concern about the issue of life and death as well as the origin of universe. This was partly owing to the influence of Buddhism. It was worth noted that discussion about spiritual beings even violated the tradition, as Confucius avoided touching in his conversation with extraordinary things. Chu Shi was one of the most radical scholars who refuted Buddhism. On the other hand, he also had most discussion about spiritual beings. In this article, I try to examine the strength and weakness in Chu Shi's point and his discourses on telepathic inspiration in worship. And I try to explain the meaning of his standpoint from the background of Confucianism.en_US
dc.identifierntnulib_tp_B0131_01_002
dc.identifier.issn1019-6706
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/75239
dc.languagezh_TW
dc.publisher國立臺灣師範大學國文學系zh_TW
dc.relation國文學報,29,77-115。zh_TW
dc.subject.other朱熹zh_TW
dc.subject.other鬼神zh_TW
dc.subject.otherzh_TW
dc.subject.other生死zh_TW
dc.subject.other魂魄zh_TW
dc.subject.other祭祀zh_TW
dc.subject.other感格zh_TW
dc.subject.other輪迴zh_TW
dc.subject.other釋氏zh_TW
dc.subject.otherChu Shien_US
dc.subject.otherSpiritual beingsen_US
dc.subject.otherEnergyen_US
dc.subject.otherChien_US
dc.subject.otherLife and deathen_US
dc.subject.otherSoulen_US
dc.subject.otherWorshipen_US
dc.subject.otherTelepathic inspirationen_US
dc.subject.otherSamsaraen_US
dc.subject.otherBuddhisten_US
dc.title朱熹的鬼神觀zh_TW
dc.titleDiscussion about Spiritual Beings from Chu Shi's Concepten_US

Files

Collections