桃園縣國中教師的學生隱私權認知與態度之研究
Abstract
本研究旨在瞭解桃園縣國中教師的學生隱私權認知與態度。為達研究目的，根據文獻探討及相關實證之研究結果設計問卷，其研究對象為桃園縣公立國民中學（不含私立學校）之現職教師，共計57所國中，獲得有效問卷572份。根據受試者填答的結果，以「描述統計」、「t考驗」、「單因子變異數分析」、「Pearson相關」、「多元迴歸」等統計方法，進行資料分析。
根據分析結果，獲致以下結論：
一、桃園縣國中教師的學生隱私權認知程度良好，在「生活私密領域隱私權」層面認知較佳。
二、桃園縣國中教師的學生隱私權態度表現情形積極，在「生活私密領域隱私權」層面態度表現最高。
三、桃園縣國中教師依其不同背景變項在學生隱私權認知之差異性分析，得到「專業背景」、「任教年資」、「學校規模」變項在教師學生隱私權認知整體或分向度皆有顯著差異存在。
四、桃園縣國中教師依其不同背景變項在學生隱私權態度之差異性分析，得到「專業背景」、「任教年資」、「學校規模」變項在學生隱私權態度整體或分向度上皆有顯著差異存在。
五、桃園縣國中教師的學生隱私權認知與教師的學生隱私權態度之間呈正相關，表示教師的學生隱私權認知程度越高，教師的學生隱私權態度也愈積極。
六、根據迴歸分析得知，桃園縣國中教師的個人背景變項及教師的學生隱私權認知對教師的學生隱私權態度具有足夠的解釋力，檢定結果均達顯著水準，共可解釋教師學生隱私權態度總變異量的41.5％，其中以「教師學生隱私權認知」較具解釋力。
The study aims to understand the junior high school teachers’ cognition and attitudes towards student privacy rights in Taoyuan County. To meet the study purpose, a questionnaire was designed according to literature review and relevant empirical research results. The study objects comprised of existing teachers from public junior high schools (private schools excluded) in Taoyuan County, with a total participation of 57 junior high schools yielding 572 valid questionnaires. The results of the respondents’ replies underwent descriptive statistics, t-test, one way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, multiple regression and other statistical methods to carry out data analysis. The following conclusions were drawn based on the analytical results： 1. Junior high school teachers of Taoyuan County demonstrated excellent cognition for the student privacy rights with a better recognition in “Privacy rights in the domain of privacy life.” 2. Junior high school teachers of Taoyuan County demonstrate active performance in student privacy rights, receiving the highest score on the attitude of “privacy rights in the domain of privacy life.” 3. Junior high school teachers of Taoyuan County received significant difference on the overall or dimensional cognition for student privacy rights in the variables of “professional background,” “seniority of teaching,” and “school scale” according to the differentiation analysis of different background variables in teachers’ cognition for student privacy rights. 4. Junior high school teachers of Taoyuan County received significant difference on the overall or dimensional attitude towards student privacy rights in variables of “professional background,” “seniority of teaching,” and “school scale” according to the differentiation analysis of different background variables in teacher attitudes towards student privacy rights. 5. There is positive correlation between the teachers’ cognition for student privacy rights and teacher attitude towards student privacy rights, indicating that higher level of teachers’ cognition for student privacy rights leads to more active attitude towards student privacy rights. 6. The regression analysis shows that teacher’s personal background variables and teachers’ cognition for student privacy rights is equipped with sufficient explanation to their attitude toward student privacy rights. The test results are significant and it can explain 41.5% of the total variance in teacher attitude towards student privacy rights. In particular, the “teacher’s cognition for the student privacy rights” contains better explanation.
The study aims to understand the junior high school teachers’ cognition and attitudes towards student privacy rights in Taoyuan County. To meet the study purpose, a questionnaire was designed according to literature review and relevant empirical research results. The study objects comprised of existing teachers from public junior high schools (private schools excluded) in Taoyuan County, with a total participation of 57 junior high schools yielding 572 valid questionnaires. The results of the respondents’ replies underwent descriptive statistics, t-test, one way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, multiple regression and other statistical methods to carry out data analysis. The following conclusions were drawn based on the analytical results： 1. Junior high school teachers of Taoyuan County demonstrated excellent cognition for the student privacy rights with a better recognition in “Privacy rights in the domain of privacy life.” 2. Junior high school teachers of Taoyuan County demonstrate active performance in student privacy rights, receiving the highest score on the attitude of “privacy rights in the domain of privacy life.” 3. Junior high school teachers of Taoyuan County received significant difference on the overall or dimensional cognition for student privacy rights in the variables of “professional background,” “seniority of teaching,” and “school scale” according to the differentiation analysis of different background variables in teachers’ cognition for student privacy rights. 4. Junior high school teachers of Taoyuan County received significant difference on the overall or dimensional attitude towards student privacy rights in variables of “professional background,” “seniority of teaching,” and “school scale” according to the differentiation analysis of different background variables in teacher attitudes towards student privacy rights. 5. There is positive correlation between the teachers’ cognition for student privacy rights and teacher attitude towards student privacy rights, indicating that higher level of teachers’ cognition for student privacy rights leads to more active attitude towards student privacy rights. 6. The regression analysis shows that teacher’s personal background variables and teachers’ cognition for student privacy rights is equipped with sufficient explanation to their attitude toward student privacy rights. The test results are significant and it can explain 41.5% of the total variance in teacher attitude towards student privacy rights. In particular, the “teacher’s cognition for the student privacy rights” contains better explanation.
Description
Keywords
隱私權, 學生隱私權, Privacy Rights, Student’s Privacy Rights