地理學方法論中的非實證論傳統

dc.contributor.author潘朝陽zh_tw
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-27T15:40:29Z
dc.date.available2014-10-27T15:40:29Z
dc.date.issued1987-03-??zh_TW
dc.description.abstractTraditionally, geography has always been regarded as a branch of the so-called “positive science”, and as such geography is held to abide by such rigorous scientific inference procedures as hypothesis, collection; evaluation; and analysis of data; verification, establishment of model, and consequently forecasting based on conclusion. Geography derived accordingly is referred to as ‘scientific geography’, the philosophy underlying known as ‘positivism’. The progress of natural sciences which has been advancing vehemently in our times has considerable impacts on the philosophy, since the 19th century positivism has become an emerging trend for methodology, calling for the application of natural sciencse, mathematical and physical models to the study of social phenomena with a view to find out universal law accountable for all that is seen and that which prevails in the cultural and social phenomena everywhere worlwide. Way back following World War II, especially during the 60's and the 70’s, Geography for study has been deeply influenced by theories like positivism and logical positivism, a lot of spatial scientifically oriented theses on the subject of geography came up one after the other, with strong backgrounds of math and physics, especially geometrical spirits, as reflected in the points, segments of line, and surfaces characterising geographical settings. As a matter of fact, there is an ab-positivism philosophy which has been prevailing and outstanding enough in the tradition of the evolution of history, be it ‘Romanticism", “Neo-Kantianism”, “Historicism”, they altogether run contrary to “Naturalism”, “Materialism”, “Empiricism”, and even “Positivism”, any that which favors “Mechanism”, they opposed researching, handling of cultural and social issues by means of natural science in one way or another, but instead they advocated “cultural historical sciences”, with stresses given to humanitarian value, individual meaningfulness, anen_US
dc.identifier69535161-5932-3E4D-3F4A-0D7E1A2E3001zh_TW
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/23710
dc.language中文zh_TW
dc.publisher地理學系zh_tw
dc.publisherDepartment of Geography, NTNUen_US
dc.relation(13),167-192zh_TW
dc.relation.ispartof國立臺灣師範大學地理研究報告zh_tw
dc.subject.other方法論zh_tw
dc.subject.other地理學zh_tw
dc.subject.other非實證論zh_tw
dc.subject.other傳統zh_tw
dc.title地理學方法論中的非實證論傳統zh-tw
dc.title.alternativeThe Tradition of Ab-Positivism in the Methodology of Geographyzh_tw

Files

Collections