國內工程及科技教育認證制度實施之調查研究
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2013-12-??
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
國立臺灣師範大學科技應用與人力資源發展學系
National Taiwan Normal University Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development
National Taiwan Normal University Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development
Abstract
國內工程及科技教育認證制度實施至今已十年,但未有任何實徵研究探究認證所帶來的影響及實施成效。故,本研究以全國大學工學院與資電學院教師的觀點,探討其對於工程及科技教育認證的認知與實施現況。以問卷調查與深度訪談為資料蒐集方式,有效回收問卷共471份,受訪對象含院長、系主任與教師共20位。研究發現:工程及科技教育認證制度實施後教師能留意教學大綱需包含的要素、教學也較為多元;但老師們較少能依據評量結果,分析學生學習情形,這也讓老師們難以評估學生核心能力在認證實施前後有否改變。另外,教師們表示跨領域合作教學有實行上的困難。最後,根據本研究結果,提出協助工程相關系所建立評分規準的建議。
Engineering Accreditation in Taiwan has been implemented for ten years. But there have always been the absences of relevant researches to investigate the implementing effectiveness. Therefore, the aim of this study attempts to explore what condition, has the accreditation had on programs, faculties and students from the views of engineering faculty. The data were collected by questionnaire survey and in-depth interview. There are 471 valid questionnaires and 20 engineering faculties, program chairs and Deans participated in the study. The findings show that faculties could pay attention to the elements of the syllabus and teach more diversely after engineering accreditation. But faculties couldn't analyze students 'learning based on the results of the assessment, which is also not easy for faculties to assess the changes of students' core competencies. In addition, faculties felled difficulty teaching interdisciplinary cooperation. Finally, according to the results of this study, recommendations are provided to establish the rubrics.
Engineering Accreditation in Taiwan has been implemented for ten years. But there have always been the absences of relevant researches to investigate the implementing effectiveness. Therefore, the aim of this study attempts to explore what condition, has the accreditation had on programs, faculties and students from the views of engineering faculty. The data were collected by questionnaire survey and in-depth interview. There are 471 valid questionnaires and 20 engineering faculties, program chairs and Deans participated in the study. The findings show that faculties could pay attention to the elements of the syllabus and teach more diversely after engineering accreditation. But faculties couldn't analyze students 'learning based on the results of the assessment, which is also not easy for faculties to assess the changes of students' core competencies. In addition, faculties felled difficulty teaching interdisciplinary cooperation. Finally, according to the results of this study, recommendations are provided to establish the rubrics.