國中生愛滋病防治教學介入成效之研究

Abstract

一、研究目的：設計適合國中生的愛滋防治多媒體教材，並評估課程介入對國中生在愛滋病知識、愛滋病度態度、愛滋病健康信念、愛滋病預防行為意圖、性別角色刻板印象及同性戀態度之成效。二、研究方法：本研究採立意取樣，實驗組及控制組前、後測準實驗研究設計，以新北市兩所學校學生為研究對象，實驗組、校內對照組及校外對照組各4個班。實驗組進行四週(每週一次，每次45分鐘)愛滋防治教學介入，對照組及校外對照組則進行原定健康教育課程。課程開始前一週進行前測，課程結束後一週進後測，共完成有效問卷317人(實驗組111人、校內對照組111人及校外對照組95人)。本研究以廣義估計方程式考驗實驗組、校內對照組及校外對照組教學介入後的差異。三、研究結果：國中生愛滋病防治教學課程介入後，實驗組的研究對象愛滋病知識、愛滋病態度、愛滋病預防行為意圖、性別角色刻板印象及同性戀態度優於對照組：實驗組的研究對象愛滋病健康信念部分層面優於對照組。四、結論與建議:依據結果，建議學校可參考本研究的內容與架構，對整體或高風險國中學生進行愛滋病防治教學介入，以提昇學生相關知能，進而在未來能達到預防效果。

Purpose: design multimedia teaching materials on AIDS prevention and control that are suitable for junior high school students, and evaluate the effects of curricular intervention on the students’ knowledge of, attitude towards and health belief in AIDS, behavioral intention towards AIDS prevention, gender role stereotype, and attitude towards homosexuality. Method: this study adopts the purposive sampling method for the quasi-experimental research design of the pre-test and post-test of experimental and control groups. By using students from two schools in New Taipei City as research subjects, the experimental group, in-school control group and out-of-school control group each includes four classes. Intervention through AIDS prevention and control courses are conducted for the experimental group for four weeks (once a week, 45 min. per course), while the control group and out-of-school control group take the course on health education as originally scheduled. The pre-test and post-test are carried out one week before and after the courses, respectively. A total of 317 valid questionnaires were collected (111, 111 and 95 persons from the experimental group, in-school control group and out-of-school control group, respectively). This study uses the Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) for testing the difference between the experimental, in-school and out-of-school groups after education intervention. Results: after taking the courses on AIDS prevention and control, research subjects in the experimental group showed better results that the control groups in their knowledge of and attitude towards AIDS, behavioral intention towards AIDS prevention, gender role stereotype, and attitude towards homosexuality; the subjects in the experimental group had better results than the control groups in the aspect of AIDS health belief. Conclusion and Suggestions: according to the results, we suggest that schools can refer to the contents and structure of this study and conduct education intervention on AIDS prevention and control for all or high risk junior high school students to enhance their relevant competences and further achieve the effect of prevention in the future.