臺北市高中職學生對全民國防教育教科書滿意度之研究

Abstract

本研究旨在瞭解臺北市中學生對幼獅版全民國防教育教科書使用滿意情形，為達研究目的，依據文獻探討分析編製「臺北市高中職學生對全民國防教育教科書滿意度問卷」，並以臺北市公私立高中職採用幼獅版全民國防教育教科書之學校學生為對象進行調查，共得有效樣本362位。所得資料以描述統計、多變項變異數及單因子變異數分析等統計方法加以分析，根據問卷調查結果歸納出若干結論如下： 一、臺北市高中職學生對幼獅版全民國防教育教科書的使用滿意度大致良好，各變項中，以「物理屬性」滿意度最高，其次是「內容屬性」，「學習屬性」之滿意度最低。 二、私立學校對教科書滿意度較公立學校為高。 三、高中對教科書滿意度較高職為高。 四、不同性別的學生在教科書滿意度上没有差異。 五、學期成績高的學生對教科書滿意度較高。 六、喜好程度高的學生對教科書滿意度較高。 七、父母職業類別與國防事務無關者對教科書滿意度高於父母職業類別與國防事務有關者。 基於上述研究結果，研究者據以提出若干建議，以供教育行政機關、教科書編輯人員、出版商、教師及未來相關研究作為參考。

This study aims to understand the degree of satisfaction toward the textbook of National Defense Education by Youth edition of students in Taipei. To serve this purpose, a questionnaire upon the above issue was designed according to the results of past studies. Then, those student users of the Youth edition were recruited to be the subjects for this questionnaire. The number of qualified subjects is 362. The data is analyzed through descriptive statistics, MANOVA, and one-way ANOVA. The results are as follows. 1.Generally speaking, senior and vocational high school students are satisfied with the textbook of National Defense Education by Youth edition. Among all the variants, “physical property” receives the highest satisfaction, then “content property”, whereas “learning property” the lowest satisfaction. 2.Private high school students are more satisfied with the Youth edition than public high school students. 3.Senior high school students are more satisfied than vocational high school students. 4.No sexual differences are found in students’ satisfaction toward the Youth edition. 5.Students who get high scores are more satisfied with the Youth edition than those with lower scores. 6.Students fond of this subject are more satisfied with the Youth edition than those who are not. 7.Students whose parents’ occupations are not related to the affairs of national defense education are more satisfied than those are. According to the above findings, the author provided some suggestions for the educational administrative staff, textbook editors, publishers, teachers, and future researchers.