女子籃球進攻戰術之分析：以亞太區奧運資格賽為例

Abstract

摘要 目的：本研究目的旨在探究亞太區奧運資格賽女子籃球在不同進攻型態以及勝負隊進攻次數、進攻時間、命中率與成功率的差異情形。方法：以亞太區奧運資格賽的女子籃球隊伍為觀察對象，分析半場戰術之組織進攻情形，共計12場賽事，紀錄進攻時間、進攻次數、進攻型態、命中率與成功率，所得資料以描述統計和無母數統計進行分析。結果：(一) 三種進攻型態在進攻次數、進攻時間、二分與三分命中率，以及成功率皆有達顯著差異；特定式與自由式的進攻次數、命中率和成功率接高於循環式，僅在進攻時間上，特定式所花費的進攻時間較自由式和循環式來的長。(二) 勝負隊在二分、三分命中率及成功率有達到顯著差異，勝隊皆高於負隊，但在進攻次數和進攻時間則無，又，勝負隊皆在特定式進攻型態的進攻次數及時間較多。結論：(一)亞太區進攻型態以特定式及自由式為主，且進攻時間也較長，而命中率與成功率亦是特定式及自由式皆高於循環式。(二) 勝負隊進攻型態的進攻次數與進攻時間不是主要影響因素，但二分、三分命中率以及成功率則攸關勝負結果。

Abstract Purpose: This study was to explore the number of attacks, offensive time, shooting percentages and success rates of women’s basketball offensive tactics in the Women’s Olympic qualifying tournament Asia-Oceania regions. In addition, further analysis was performed to identify win-lose outcome on offensive patterns. Methods: Date were collected during the 2020 FIBA Women’s Olympic pre-Qualifying Asia Tournament. Twelve matches were observed and parameters were measured through videotapes.The measured including the offensive time, numbers of attacks, offensive patterns, shooting percentage and success rate by each set play in half-court. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric method were used to test the difference between offensive patterns and win-lose outcome. Results: (a) The number of attacks, offensive time, two-point and three-point shooting percentages, and success rates showed significant difference between three patterns of offensive. The number of attacks, shooting percentages, and success rates of set play and motion patterns were higher than continuity patters. Only offensive time of set play longer than motion and continuity patterns. (b) The two-point percentages, three-point percentages and success rates showed significant difference between team of win-lose, win team higher than lose team. No significant in the number of attacks and offensive time was observed, but the number of attacks and offense time of set play patterns longer than motion and continuity patterns. Conclusion: (a) the Asia-Oceania regions showed highest number of attacks, offensive time, shooting percentages and success rates in the set play and motion patterns. (b) The win-lose outcome was related to two-point percentages, three-point percentages, and success rates, but the number of attacks and offensive time were not.