從參加促進者訓練談促進性溝通的爭議

Simple item page
dc.contributor.author陳明聰zh_tw
dc.contributor.author陳思涵zh_tw
dc.contributor.authorMing-Chung Chenen_US
dc.contributor.authorSzu-Han Kay Chenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-12T05:06:22Z
dc.date.available2019-08-12T05:06:22Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-??
dc.description.abstract國際輔助溝通學會在 2014 年正式宣布不推薦在實務上應用促進性溝通，但仍有不少倡議者提倡此方法。筆者們藉參加美國雪城大學舉辦的促進者研習經驗，提出五點爭議並進行相關討論，這些爭議課題包括： FC 是輔助溝通或是指導方式、FC 訊息的可靠性、促進者的角色與功能、FC 的適用性、特殊教育服務可否納入 FC。zh_tw
dc.description.abstractFacilitated communication (FC) was officially not recommended for use in clinical practice by the International Society of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC) in 2014. Based on the experience gained attending a workshop for facilitators at Syracuse University, the authors proposed five issues for further consideration: whether FC is a form of AAC or a kind of coaching method, authorship of message, the roles of the facilitator, when if FC should be selected, and if FC is a viable option for services in special education.en_US
dc.identifier9850D72F-BEB0-3BA7-5941-6391F48A257B
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:80/handle/20.500.12235/81614
dc.language中文
dc.publisher國立台灣師範大學特殊教育中心zh_tw
dc.publisherNational Taiwan Normal University Special Education Centeren_US
dc.relation(141)，1-10
dc.relation.ispartof特殊教育季刊zh_tw
dc.subject.other促進性溝通zh_tw
dc.subject.other促進者zh_tw
dc.subject.other作者權zh_tw
dc.subject.other輔助溝通zh_tw
dc.subject.otherfacilitated communicationen_US
dc.subject.otherfacilitatoren_US
dc.subject.otherauthorshipen_US
dc.subject.otheraugmentative and alternative communicationen_US
dc.title從參加促進者訓練談促進性溝通的爭議zh-tw
dc.title.alternativeThe Issues of Facilitated Communication based on the Experience of Attending a Facilitator Workshopzh_tw

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ntnulib_ja_K0301_0141_001.pdf
Size:
1.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

特殊教育季刊