大專女性不同蹲舉動作之膝關節力矩分析

dc.contributor張家豪zh_TW
dc.contributorJia-Hao Changen_US
dc.contributor.author黃科贏zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorKo-Yin Huangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-05T07:16:56Z
dc.date.available不公開
dc.date.available2019-09-05T07:16:56Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstract目的:探討大專女性在不同負重下,進行不同方式蹲舉時,其膝關節力矩的差異性。方法:使用動作擷取系統、測力板,擷取12名大專女性(一週有兩次運動習慣,平均年齡20.08±1.18歲,平均身高163.42±3.73公分,平均體重57.92±4.87公斤),在1/3及1/2蹲舉時分別負重0%、25%、50%及75% 1RM的膝關節運動學及動力學情形。以重複量數二因子變異數分析比較其差異性,顯著水準定在α=.05,並以LSD進行事後比較。結果:屈曲伸展最大力矩在1/3蹲舉(0.876±0.201~1.781±0.426Nm/kg)及1/2蹲舉(0.949± 0.183~1.788±0.444Nm/kg)未達顯著差異,但隨著負重愈大,曲屈伸展最大力矩明顯變大(p<.05);內收外展最大力矩在1/2蹲舉時(0.362±0.229~0.772±0.342Nm/kg)明顯大於1/3蹲舉(0.274±0.130~0.674±0.309Nm/kg),且隨著負重愈大,內收外展最大力矩明顯變大(p<.05);內旋外旋最大力矩在1/2蹲舉時(0.128±0.030~0.248±0.091Nm/kg)明顯大於1/3蹲舉(0.107±0.028~0.221±0.118Nm/kg),雖然負重越大力矩越大(p<.05),但負重0%與25% 1RM未達顯著差異。結論:進行蹲舉運動時,若考量膝關節傷害的可能性,可以利用1/3蹲舉替代1/2蹲舉,降低因為內收外展及內旋外旋最大力矩造成的膝關節不穩定。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To investigate the variation of different postures and loadings of barbell squats on knee joint moment on female collegiate. Methods: The KISTER force plate and the VICON Motion Capture Systems were used to acquire 12 female collegiate’ (age: 20.08±1.18 yrs, weight: 57.92±4.87 kg, height: 163.42±3.73 cm) knee joint kinetic and kinematic data during 1/2 and 1/3 barbell squats with weighting 0%, 25%, 50% and 75% 1RM. Two-way repeated ANOVA with repeated measure and LSD post hoc comparisons (α= .05) were used for statistics. Results: The maximal moment of flexion/extension were 0.876 ± 0.201 ~ 1.781 ± 0.426 (Nm/kg) in 1/3 squats, and 0.949±0.183 ~ 1.788 ± 0.444 (Nm/kg) in 1/2 squats. There were no significant difference between two types of barbell squats; nevertheless, the loading increases as the moment increases, the maximal moment of flexion/extension significantly increased (p<.05). Adduction/ abduction moments of the knee joint were significantly greater for 1/2 squats (0.362±0.229~0.772±0.342 Nm/kg) than 1/3 squats (0.274±0.130~0.674±0.309 Nm/kg), and the loading increases as the moment increases, the maximal moment of adduction/ abduction significantly increased (p<.05). Internal/external rotation moments of the knee joint were significantly greater for 1/2 squats (0.128±0.030~0.248±0.091 Nm/kg) than 1/3 squats(0.107±0.028~0.221±0.118 Nm/kg). The loading increasesas the moment increases, the maximal moment internal/external rotation of significantly increased (p<.05) except the moment between 0% and 25% 1RM. Conclusion: This results indicated that 1/3 squat is suitable for decreasing the instability of knee due to lower adduction/ abduction and internal/ external rotation moments.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship體育學系zh_TW
dc.identifierGN0095043115
dc.identifier.urihttp://etds.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&s=id=%22GN0095043115%22.&%22.id.&amp;
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:80/handle/20.500.12235/105219
dc.language中文
dc.subject蹲舉方式zh_TW
dc.subject不同負重zh_TW
dc.subject膝關節力矩zh_TW
dc.subjectbarbell squats typeen_US
dc.subjectdifferent loadingen_US
dc.subjectKnee joint momenten_US
dc.title大專女性不同蹲舉動作之膝關節力矩分析zh_TW
dc.titleComparision of knee joint moments for different squat postures on female collegiateen_US

Files

Collections