不同探究教學模式對高二學生運用QCNLive進行地震學習的影響
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2013
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
本研究旨在課程中運用QCNLive並探討不同探究式教學對高二學生的影響。本研究為準實驗研究法,研究對象為247位台北市某高中二年級學生。探究式教學在近年來成為科學教學的主流,探究式教學營造的學習環境,包括完全開放式探究、引導式探究(介於完全開放式探究與結構式探究之間)以及結構式探究。不同的探究式教學對學生學習的影響仍有許多爭議。因此,本研究旨在探討結構式探究與引導式探究教學對學生學習的影響。
本研究設計結構式與引導式兩種探究式地震課程(課程中的探究活動均使用QCNLive),並運用地震學成就測驗、地震學態度量表、學習環境量表來評估不同教學對學習者的影響。研究結果顯示:1.結構式探究教學班級學生在記憶性問題表現較佳。2.引導式探究教學班級學生在問題解決問答表現較佳。3.當學習者感受到的學習環境,越接近他/她心中理想的學習環境時,對地震學越能抱持越正向的態度。4.地震學成就測驗與地震學態度成正相關。5.高二學生偏好的探究學習環境為兼具教師中心之結構式探究與學生中心之開放式探究的引導式探究。
This study aimed to explore the impact of the use of QCNLive and different forms of inquiry education on senior high school sophomores. The study adopted the quasi-experimental research method, taking a group of 247 sophomores at a certain Taipei city senior high school as subjects. In recent years, inquiry education has become the mainstream of science education. The learning environment which inquiry education creates includes open inquiry, structured inquiry, and guided inquiry (which falls between open inquiry and structured inquiry). There is still a good deal of controversy surrounding the effects that the different kinds of inquiry education have on students. Hence, the focus of this study was to investigate the effects that structured inquiry and guided inquiry methods have on students’ learning. The study was designed to look at two kinds of inquiry education, structured and guided, as used in courses on the study of earthquakes (all inquiry activities of the courses used QCNLive), and made use of seismology achievement testing, seismology attitude rating, and learning environment rating to assess the different education methods on the learners. Results demonstrated that: 1. Students in the structured inquiry class performed better on memory-related problems. 2. Students in the guided inquiry class performed better in problem-solving question and answer sessions. 3. The closer learners felt the learning environment was to their own ideal learning environment, the more able they were to maintain a positive attitude towards earthquake study. 4. There is a positive correlation between seismology achievement testing and seismology attitude. 5. The two preferred inquiry learning environments for high school sophomores were a teacher-centered structured inquiry model and a student-centered open guided inquiry model.
This study aimed to explore the impact of the use of QCNLive and different forms of inquiry education on senior high school sophomores. The study adopted the quasi-experimental research method, taking a group of 247 sophomores at a certain Taipei city senior high school as subjects. In recent years, inquiry education has become the mainstream of science education. The learning environment which inquiry education creates includes open inquiry, structured inquiry, and guided inquiry (which falls between open inquiry and structured inquiry). There is still a good deal of controversy surrounding the effects that the different kinds of inquiry education have on students. Hence, the focus of this study was to investigate the effects that structured inquiry and guided inquiry methods have on students’ learning. The study was designed to look at two kinds of inquiry education, structured and guided, as used in courses on the study of earthquakes (all inquiry activities of the courses used QCNLive), and made use of seismology achievement testing, seismology attitude rating, and learning environment rating to assess the different education methods on the learners. Results demonstrated that: 1. Students in the structured inquiry class performed better on memory-related problems. 2. Students in the guided inquiry class performed better in problem-solving question and answer sessions. 3. The closer learners felt the learning environment was to their own ideal learning environment, the more able they were to maintain a positive attitude towards earthquake study. 4. There is a positive correlation between seismology achievement testing and seismology attitude. 5. The two preferred inquiry learning environments for high school sophomores were a teacher-centered structured inquiry model and a student-centered open guided inquiry model.
Description
Keywords
探究教學, 學習環境, inquiry education, learning environment