創作語彙的解構與建構：剖析觀念性創作之研究

Abstract

作品的發想來自何處，是如何產生的，從創作者和觀者（詮釋者）對於作品的認識，始終存在普遍性的誤讀。當作品完成後，總是期待著觀者是否可以接收到創作者想要傳遞的訊息和觀點。因此產生諸多形式上的呈現和概念論述輔助觀者進行理解。即使如此，觀者面對作品時，仍產生疑問以及自行詮釋後的觀點。創作者是否充分覺察到「靈感」、「草圖」及「作品」三者在創作歷程中的從屬和依附關係以及概念生成的途徑。因此本創作研究以文獻分析、個案訪談之質化研究以及創作實踐後之反身性詮釋進行評估與實踐。研究採三階段進行：階段一、從文獻分析整理和深度訪談各領域專家，探討靈感浮現的關鍵要素和記錄方式，以及在創作前期從靈感到草圖的產生和創作歷程之關鍵要點與認知差異，探究「靈感」和「草圖」對創作者的影響；階段二、將訪談後的資料歸納整理出相關概念。並從觀念性創作與日常共生互構的推測研究，探索「靈感」與「草圖」生成的歷程和創作取徑日常議題的必然性，創作者通過日常生活的參與和觀察汲取靈感，除了重塑主體價值，亦可反思自我在社會脈絡中位置與價值；階段三、進行反身性詮釋取徑創作歷程，引導本研究創作思考方式轉化為具體的行動和決策。除了重新詮釋所理解的資料並提出新的觀點以及反思研究者的理解是否洽當與分析關鍵要點。並透過創作歷程與研究成果和對自身創作所構築的初步架構中，期望超越個人視覺風格的追求，避免陷入慣性思維與固有之創作模式。本研究初期彙整出四個評估構面及廿五項關鍵因子為主要結論，不僅為理解「草圖」、「靈感」與「作品」間的相互關係提供基礎理解，也為創作實踐提供理論框架和實踐指南。創作過程中，「靈感」、「草圖」及「作品」之間的關係無論在何種途徑、形式或媒材下，始終無法迴避或簡化。本創作過程中發現跨領域間雖存在專業上的差異，但多數專家認同「草圖」與「作品」的相互關係是緊密的。此外，創作者在與專家互動過程中，通過單向仿照、指涉與參照，形成互文作用，並對創作思維產生影響。這種現象為創作者帶來新的視野和想法，且構築初步的概念和方向。研究發現靈感的來源不僅限於視覺領域，未來將探討其他創作領域中「靈感」、「草圖」和「作品」的相互關係，且持續深入探索日常生活，反思、描述並構築個人日常文化的象限。以此為提供所有創作者的創作之源泉與依歸。最後，本研究相信未來透過「生成式AI」從事創作前靈感發想與草圖建構變得更加容易、快速，並將投入更深入的研究思考、探究及其應用。The genesis of an artwork and how it comes into being, as well as the recognition of the work by both the creator and the viewer (interpreter), are perpetually prone to universal misinterpretations. Upon completion of an artwork, there is an anticipatory query whether the viewer can assimilate the message and perspective intended by the creator. Consequently, multiple forms of presentations and conceptual discourses are employed to assist viewers in understanding. Nevertheless, viewers still encounter uncertainties and develop personal interpretations when confronted with the artwork. It is imperative for creators to be fully cognizant of the subordinate and dependent relationships among"inspiration," "sketch," and "work," as well as the pathways of conceptual generation. Thus, this artistic research employs literature review, qualitative case interviews, and reflexive interpretations post-creative practice for evaluation and implementation. The study is conducted in three phases: Phase One: Through literature review and deep interviews with experts across various fields, this phase investigates the key elements and documentation methods for the emergence of inspiration, as well as the critical points and cognitive differences from inspiration to sketch in the early stages of creation, exploring the impact of"inspiration" and "sketch" on the creator. Phase Two: This phase involves synthesizing and organizing the data gathered from interviews into relevant concepts. It includes speculative research on conceptual creation and the symbiotic interplay with daily life, exploring the process of generating "inspiration" and "sketch" and the inevitability of addressing everyday issues in creative approaches. Creators draw inspiration from engaging with and observing everyday life, not only reshaping subjective values but also reflecting on their social contextual position and value. Phase Three: This phase encompasses a reflexive interpretative approach to the creative process, guiding the transformation of creative thought in this study into concrete actions and decisions. It involves reinterpreting understood data, presenting new insights, and reflecting on whether the researcher's understanding and analysis of key points are appropriate. Through the creative process and research outcomes within the preliminary framework constructed for their creation, the aim is to transcend the pursuit of personal visual style and avoid conventional creative patterns and habitual thinking. The initial findings of this research outline four assessment dimensions and twenty-five key factors, providing a fundamental understanding of the interrelationships among "sketch," "inspiration," and "work," as well as offering a theoretical framework and practical guide for creative practice. Regardless of the approach, form, or medium, the relationships between "inspiration," "sketch," and "work" in the creative process are intricate and cannot be simplified or avoided. During the creative process, despite professional differences across disciplines, most experts concur that the relationship between "sketch" and "work" is closely knit. Additionally, creators form intertextual effects through one-way imitation, reference, and citation during interactions with experts, impacting creative thinking. This phenomenon grants creators new perspectives and ideas, building preliminary concepts and directions. The research discovers that sources of inspiration are not confined to the visual domain; future explorations will examine the interrelationships among"inspiration," "sketch," and "work" in other creative fields and continue to delve deeply into everyday life to reflect, describe, and construct the quadrants of personal daily culture. This serves as a source and foundation for all creators' artistic endeavors. Lastly, the research believes that the advent of "generative AI" will simplify and expedite the initial stages of inspiration and sketch construction, fostering deeper research, exploration, and application.