雲林縣國民中學健康與體育學習領域教師教學自我效能與教師有效教學之調查研究
Abstract
摘 要
本研究旨在探討國民中學健康與體育學習領域教師教學自我效能與教師有效教學之調查研究，除探討雲林縣國民中學健康與體育學習領域教師教學自我效能與教師有效教學的內涵及現況，瞭解教師人口變項對健康與體育學習領域教師教學自我效能與教師有效教學之差異情形，亦分析教師教學自我效能與教師有效教學之相關程度，教師人口變項對教師教學自我效能、教師有效教學之預測力。根據研究結果分析與發現，提出結論與建議，期望能提供教育行政機關、學校、教師及未來相關研究之參考。
本研究採問卷普查的方式進行研究。使用「國民中學九年一貫課程健康與體育學習領域教師教學自我效能與教師有效教學問卷」為研究工具，問卷調查對象為雲林縣公立國民中學（含縣立綜合高中國中部）健康與體育學習領域教師，進行全縣普查31 所公立國民中學，113 位實際授課健康教育與體育課程之教師，回收樣本有效問卷共113份。調查所得的資料分別進行統計與分析，包括平均數、標準差、t 考驗、變異數分析、多元迴歸分析等統計方法進行分析，最後歸納獲致下列結論：
一、雲林縣國民中學健康與體育學習領域教師人數，體育教師佔72.6%，健康教育師資嚴重不足。
二、健康與體育學習領域教師教學自我效能具有中上程度的效能。
三、健康與體育學習領域教師有效教學具有中上程度的效能。
四、教師體育課程教學自我效能顯著高於健康教育課程教學自我效能。
五、不同教師人口學變項中，僅教師教育背景（F =5.47，p<.001）、任教科目（F =11.47，p <.001）在教師教學自我效能達顯著關係。
六、不同教師社會人口學變項對於健康教育課程之教師教學自我效能並無顯著關係。
七、不同教師社會人口學變項中，僅教育背景（F =11.73，p <.001）、任教科目（F =27.83，p <.001）在教師體育課程教學效能上達顯著差異。
八、不同教師社會人口學變項中，僅教育背景（F =3.78，p <.01）、任教科目（F =3.56，p <.05）與現任職務（F =2.85，p <.05）在教師有效教學上有差異。
九、教師教學自我效能對於教師有效教學的預測力達67.7％。
關鍵字：教師教學自我效能、教學有效教學
ABSTRACT This thesis is a study of the self-efficiency and teaching efficiency of Health and Physical Education educators within the junior high school field of Health and Physical Education. The thesis will also study the educator’s individuality and its influence on self-efficiency and teaching efficiency, and how these varieties effect the educator’s prediction within the junior high schools of Yun-Ling County. The researcher further hopes that the findings of this thesis will be helpful to the future researches of educational administrations, schools and educators. The research is processed through census questionnaires. With the use of “The self-efficiency and teaching efficiency of Health and Physical Education educators in the Junior High Health and Physical Education” questionnaire, the targets include the 113 Heath and PE related educators of 31 public junior high schools in Yun-Ling County (including that of the junior high of public variety schools). One hundred and thirteen questionnaires were found valid. The result analysis and statistics of the questionnaires include average sum, standard deviation, T test, one-way ANOVA, and multiple regression analyses. The conclusion is as follows: 1. 72.6% of the Health and Physical Education related educators in Yun-Ling County are PE teachers, indicating a serious lack of educators of Health. 2. Educators of Health and Physical Education have an above-the-average ability towards self-efficiency. 3. Educators of Health and Physical Education have an above-the-average ability towards teaching efficiency. 4. The Educators’ self-efficiency of physical education is much higher than the self-efficiency of health education. 5. Among the various variables, only the educator’s background (F = 5.47，p<.001) and the subject taught (F =11.47，p <.001) have noticeable relation to self-efficiency. 6. The social population variable among educators has little to do with the self-efficiency of Health educators. 7. Among the various variables, only the educator’s background (F = 11.73，p <.001) and the subject taught (F =27.83，p <.001) have noticeable relation to the PE educator’s teaching efficiency. 8. Among the various variables, only the educator’s background (F =3.78，p <.01), the subjecttaught (F =3.56，p<.05) and current occupation (F =2.85，p <.05) have noticeable relation to teaching efficiency. 9. The educator’s self-efficiency has a 67.7％ prediction effect on teaching efficiency Key Words: self-efficiency and teaching efficiency.
ABSTRACT This thesis is a study of the self-efficiency and teaching efficiency of Health and Physical Education educators within the junior high school field of Health and Physical Education. The thesis will also study the educator’s individuality and its influence on self-efficiency and teaching efficiency, and how these varieties effect the educator’s prediction within the junior high schools of Yun-Ling County. The researcher further hopes that the findings of this thesis will be helpful to the future researches of educational administrations, schools and educators. The research is processed through census questionnaires. With the use of “The self-efficiency and teaching efficiency of Health and Physical Education educators in the Junior High Health and Physical Education” questionnaire, the targets include the 113 Heath and PE related educators of 31 public junior high schools in Yun-Ling County (including that of the junior high of public variety schools). One hundred and thirteen questionnaires were found valid. The result analysis and statistics of the questionnaires include average sum, standard deviation, T test, one-way ANOVA, and multiple regression analyses. The conclusion is as follows: 1. 72.6% of the Health and Physical Education related educators in Yun-Ling County are PE teachers, indicating a serious lack of educators of Health. 2. Educators of Health and Physical Education have an above-the-average ability towards self-efficiency. 3. Educators of Health and Physical Education have an above-the-average ability towards teaching efficiency. 4. The Educators’ self-efficiency of physical education is much higher than the self-efficiency of health education. 5. Among the various variables, only the educator’s background (F = 5.47，p<.001) and the subject taught (F =11.47，p <.001) have noticeable relation to self-efficiency. 6. The social population variable among educators has little to do with the self-efficiency of Health educators. 7. Among the various variables, only the educator’s background (F = 11.73，p <.001) and the subject taught (F =27.83，p <.001) have noticeable relation to the PE educator’s teaching efficiency. 8. Among the various variables, only the educator’s background (F =3.78，p <.01), the subjecttaught (F =3.56，p<.05) and current occupation (F =2.85，p <.05) have noticeable relation to teaching efficiency. 9. The educator’s self-efficiency has a 67.7％ prediction effect on teaching efficiency Key Words: self-efficiency and teaching efficiency.
Description
Keywords
教師教學自我效能, 教師有效教學, self-efficiency, teaching efficiency