越南中部之森林保護的利益分享機制及生計：兩個原住民社群團體的觀察研究
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2019-11-??
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
地理學系
Department of Geography, NTNU
Department of Geography, NTNU
Abstract
森林退化、貧窮與森林保育之間的關係一直不清楚。本研究選定越南中部的Huong Hiep 及ThuongNhat，目標為找出利益分享機制（BSM），森林保育與對原住民社群權力下放的影響。研究方法為永續生計法並將生計影響細分為金融，自然，物理，社會，文化與人力資本；這些資本之間相互影響並且不斷變動。本研究進行家庭生計問卷（n=85），半結構式訪談，並有家庭及其他利害關係人的焦點團體討論。研究期間為2013 與2014 年的夏天，為期共四個月。Thuong Nhat 的BSM 與社區林業計畫充分發展；Huong Hiep 則仍在發展中。由於各個家庭森林巡護的費用相對較低，因此BSM 經濟影響極小。另一方面，BSM 加劇Huong Hiep 所得不均，因為只有部分選定的菁英家庭能夠得到森林保育的經濟利益。BSM 和權力下放讓Thuong Nhat 的原住民能夠透過所謂社群Red Books 的方式合法擁有社群森林土地。Thuong Nhat 的家庭能在他們的森林收取非木材林產品（NTFPs）並砍樹蓋房。BSM和森林保育強化政府在社群森林使用的影響。這也破壞了傳統森林分類並禁止遊墾農業。由於BSM與社區林業，傳統機構與森林分類與生計對Thuong Nhat 的影響大幅降低。然而，Huong Hiep 的家庭仍沿用傳統方式管理森林。最後，本研究找出影響BSM 在越南成功與失敗的內在與外在因素。這些因素包括：家庭生計的多元發展能力、社群和傳統機構的參與、土地運用和信用貸款、人力與社會資本的累積、復原能力的增加。
The relationship between forest degradation, poverty and conservation has been unclear. The objectiveof this study was to identify the impacts of benefit sharing mechanism (BSM), forest conservation anddevolution on indigenous communities in two selected communes (sub-district level units) in CentralVietnam: Huong Hiep and Thuong Nhat. To do this, we adopted a sustainable livelihoods approach andsubdivided livelihood impacts into financial, natural, physical, social, cultural and human capitals. Thesetypes of capital are interconnected and continuously subjected to change. For this study, we conductedlivelihood surveys on household level (n=85), and semi-structured interviews and focus group discussionswith households and other stakeholders. The research has been conducted in the summers of 2013 and 2014for four months in total. Thuong Nhat was a commune with a fully developed BSM and community forestryscheme. Huong Hiep, on the other hand, was still in the process of developing a similar scheme. The financialimpact of BSM was minimal as the fee for forest patrolling for individual households was relatively small.On the other hand, BSM exacerbated income inequality in Huong Hiep as only selected elite households wereeligible for receiving financial benefits for forest conservation. BSM and forest devolution allowedcommunities to legally own community forestland in Thuong Nhat through so-called community Red Books.Households in Thuong Nhat were able to collect non-timber forest products (NTFPs) and cut trees forhousing in their forest. BSM and forest conservation consolidated the influence of the formal institutions onforest use in the communities. This led to the deterioration of customary forest classifications and a ban onswidden agriculture. Whereas in Thuong Nhat the influence of customary institutions, forest classificationsand livelihoods was largely diminished as a result of BSM and community forestry, households in HuongHiep still adhered to their customary ways of managing the forest. Lastly, this study identified internal andexternal drivers for success and failure of BSM in Vietnam. These drivers included: the ability for householdsto diversify their livelihoods; involvement of the community, and customary institutions and arrangements;access to land and credit; human and social capital accumulation; and increased resilience.
The relationship between forest degradation, poverty and conservation has been unclear. The objectiveof this study was to identify the impacts of benefit sharing mechanism (BSM), forest conservation anddevolution on indigenous communities in two selected communes (sub-district level units) in CentralVietnam: Huong Hiep and Thuong Nhat. To do this, we adopted a sustainable livelihoods approach andsubdivided livelihood impacts into financial, natural, physical, social, cultural and human capitals. Thesetypes of capital are interconnected and continuously subjected to change. For this study, we conductedlivelihood surveys on household level (n=85), and semi-structured interviews and focus group discussionswith households and other stakeholders. The research has been conducted in the summers of 2013 and 2014for four months in total. Thuong Nhat was a commune with a fully developed BSM and community forestryscheme. Huong Hiep, on the other hand, was still in the process of developing a similar scheme. The financialimpact of BSM was minimal as the fee for forest patrolling for individual households was relatively small.On the other hand, BSM exacerbated income inequality in Huong Hiep as only selected elite households wereeligible for receiving financial benefits for forest conservation. BSM and forest devolution allowedcommunities to legally own community forestland in Thuong Nhat through so-called community Red Books.Households in Thuong Nhat were able to collect non-timber forest products (NTFPs) and cut trees forhousing in their forest. BSM and forest conservation consolidated the influence of the formal institutions onforest use in the communities. This led to the deterioration of customary forest classifications and a ban onswidden agriculture. Whereas in Thuong Nhat the influence of customary institutions, forest classificationsand livelihoods was largely diminished as a result of BSM and community forestry, households in HuongHiep still adhered to their customary ways of managing the forest. Lastly, this study identified internal andexternal drivers for success and failure of BSM in Vietnam. These drivers included: the ability for householdsto diversify their livelihoods; involvement of the community, and customary institutions and arrangements;access to land and credit; human and social capital accumulation; and increased resilience.