大專院校圖書館期刊訂購模式改變之探討-以台師大為例
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2008
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
電子期刊已成為大專院校內,師生所共同倚賴的學術資源,然而期刊的漲幅問題,卻沒有多大的改變,以往各國圖書館界在面對西文期刊的漲幅與圖書館本身經費緊縮的問題時,長久以來就像是希臘神話中的薛西弗斯(Sisyphus)所面對的情況,他快將把巨石推到山頂時,巨石又滾下來,他只得重新再推,永無終止。
進入21世紀之後,期刊電子化時代的來臨,出版社紛紛將旗下的紙本期刊電子化,部分期刊甚至只出電子版(E-only),如The Berkeley Electronic Press只出版電子期刊,不提供紙本,與此同時,部分圖書館也開始改變其訂購模式,將所訂購的紙本期刊改訂為電子版,但是後續對圖書館衍生的典藏問題、服務模式的不同,都必須有配套的方案。
針對此紙本轉訂電子版的訂購模式改變可能照成的影響,本研究以台師大為樣本,選擇有訂購Elsevier出版社期刊的21個系所進行訪談,以了解各系所對紙本期刊改訂電子版的訂購模式改變,有何看法,並在文獻探討中,探討國內外大學的實際案例與國外的研究,並列舉可節省的成本,期望研究成果能供國內大專院校圖書館參考。
本研究的結論如下:1.紙本期刊與電子期刊的定價差額不大,2.西文期刊出版社的紙本與電子訂價模式差異頗大,3.出版社透過第三方提供電子期刊的永久典藏,4.西文期刊出版社的併購風潮盛行,刊價不易有所變動,5.訂購模式改變之後,可以節省部分成本,但仍須增加支出,6.圖書館可採取主動式的服務,7.圖書館可以提供期刊目次資料的整理,8.圖書館須提供經費分配方面的配套措施,9.訂購模式改變後,系所期刊經費希望由學校統籌配置的比率不低,10.訂購模式改變之後,系所主任對無紙本館藏的接受程度不高,11.電子資源的使用率將改變系所改訂電子版的意願。
針對研究的結果,有以下的研究建議:1.針對校內師生進行問卷調查,2.提出完整的配套方案,尋求更多系所的支持,3.建議還可以訪談各系所的圖書委員,以做較完整的了解,4.建議能以台師大開始,建立訂購模式改變後的各項相關數據變化與成本分析,以俾他館參考,5.由於政府資訊公開法已於民國94年12月28日公布實施,其條文第7條並規定如文教機構之預算及決算書、支付或接受之補助,除依第十八條規定限制公開或不予提供者外,應主動公開,具有中華民國國籍並在中華民國設籍之國民及其所設立之本國法人、團體,亦可向政府機關申請提供政府資訊者,因此將來的研究者,若研究對象為國立之大專院校,應可依照條文之規定,索取相關的資料。
Nowadays, the use of scholarly electronic journals is becoming the trend against print journals in academic institutions. However the situation between libraries and journal prices is like Sisyphus and the huge boulder he rolled. Traditionally, libraries will cancel journal titles, but now they can choose to subscribe electronic journals instead of print journals. But not all faculties agreed this change, some elder faculties prefer print journals because of failing eyesight, and the preservation of e-journals is another question. Therefore, in this research, there were 21 chairmen whose departments subscribed Elsevier journals been interviewed to see if they can accept this change and agree to let library to handle their budget in journal subscription. Conclusions as below: 1.The price between print and e-journal are close, 2.Different publishers had different pricing model, 3.Publishers authorized the third party to preserve their journal archives, 4.The mergence between publishers is becoming popular, and the journal prices are not easy to level down, 5.After transferring from print to e-journals, there are expenditures differs from print collections, 6.Libraries can provide actively services, 7.Libraries can provide and marshal TOC to faculties, 8.Library have to draw a complete proposal of distributing budget, 9.Departments prefer to control the budget themselves, 10.Chairmen prefer “print” journals. 11.The increasing usage rate of e-resources will change Chairmen’s attitude finally. Suggestions of this study are: 1.Performing a survey to faculty and students, 2.Seeking more support from chairmen with a complete proposal, 3.Interviewing more journal selection committee in each departments, 4.After changing the subscription model, library have to collect the related numbers and do benefit-cost analysis for reference, 5.Using the Freedom of Government Information Act to apply the information for research to national academic institutions.
Nowadays, the use of scholarly electronic journals is becoming the trend against print journals in academic institutions. However the situation between libraries and journal prices is like Sisyphus and the huge boulder he rolled. Traditionally, libraries will cancel journal titles, but now they can choose to subscribe electronic journals instead of print journals. But not all faculties agreed this change, some elder faculties prefer print journals because of failing eyesight, and the preservation of e-journals is another question. Therefore, in this research, there were 21 chairmen whose departments subscribed Elsevier journals been interviewed to see if they can accept this change and agree to let library to handle their budget in journal subscription. Conclusions as below: 1.The price between print and e-journal are close, 2.Different publishers had different pricing model, 3.Publishers authorized the third party to preserve their journal archives, 4.The mergence between publishers is becoming popular, and the journal prices are not easy to level down, 5.After transferring from print to e-journals, there are expenditures differs from print collections, 6.Libraries can provide actively services, 7.Libraries can provide and marshal TOC to faculties, 8.Library have to draw a complete proposal of distributing budget, 9.Departments prefer to control the budget themselves, 10.Chairmen prefer “print” journals. 11.The increasing usage rate of e-resources will change Chairmen’s attitude finally. Suggestions of this study are: 1.Performing a survey to faculty and students, 2.Seeking more support from chairmen with a complete proposal, 3.Interviewing more journal selection committee in each departments, 4.After changing the subscription model, library have to collect the related numbers and do benefit-cost analysis for reference, 5.Using the Freedom of Government Information Act to apply the information for research to national academic institutions.
Description
Keywords
期刊訂購模式, 電子期刊, 學術傳播, 期刊危機, 館藏發展, Journal subscription model, Electronic Journal, Scholarly Communication, Serials Crisis, Collection Development