高中地理專題研究評量指標建構的研究
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2015
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
「專題研究」是我國高中階段教育積極推動的方向之一,但過去少見專為地理專題研究發展的正式評量工具。本研究旨在發展一套評量指標與評分規準,以提供高中地理科老師在指導學生進行地理專題研究時參考,也讓學生更清楚的體認高中階段地理專題研究所應達成的目標。主要採行的方法是三階段模糊德爾菲法,共計27位專家協助填寫問卷,包括10位地理相關科系的大專教師和17位高中地理科教師。專家們均有地理專題研究報告之評審或小論文指導經驗者。
經過三階段模糊德爾菲法彙整專家意見,以及參考國內多項地理競賽標準,本研究建立了一份包含五個向度25項指標與6項「重要次指標」的評量指標與規準。五個向度(總分105%)依序為:研究主題與文獻回顧(20%)、研究方法:資料蒐集選擇與紀錄(20%)、資料分析與評估(30%)、結論(建議)與參考文獻(20%)、報告的呈現(15%);各向度的指標數3至7項不等,各指標的評分規準則分為優異、良好、尚可、待加強四個層級。共識度最高的指標有九項,其中最高的包括「4-1結論緊扣研究目的,且有證據支持」與「3-3根據研究目的,描述、分析、綜合、並解釋研究結果」,專家一致認為這是專題研究中必備的指標。相對的,「重要次指標」是指模糊數值最低,專家共識度較低,且爭議性較大的,歸納原因有三:「該指標超出高中生能力範圍」、「該指標的評分規準四個層次之間較難區分」或「該指標不見得每個研究都需要」。本研究提出的高中地理專題研究的評量指標與評分規準,可視為一個參考模版,地理科教師宜根據各校的主客觀條件,編修一套符合該校需求的評量指標與評分規準。
The main aim of this study is to develop a set of assessment indicators and rubrics especially for Project-based Learning (PBL) in geography at senior high school level. Three-round Fuzzy Delphi survey was applied to collect experts’ comments. Twenty-seven experts, including 10 academic geographers and 17 senior high school geography teachers, contributed through questionnaire surveys. A set of assessment indicators and rubrics, consisting of five dimensions and 25 indicators with 6 ’important secondary indicators’ were developed accordingly. Results show that indicators which are ’beyond high school student capabilities‘, ’statements of four levels not clearly differentiated’ or ’'not appropriate to all essay topics’ have the relative low expert consensus. The proposed indicators and rubrics can serve as a reference template, i.e., a starting point for geography teachers to develop a customized assessment scheme for their own students.
The main aim of this study is to develop a set of assessment indicators and rubrics especially for Project-based Learning (PBL) in geography at senior high school level. Three-round Fuzzy Delphi survey was applied to collect experts’ comments. Twenty-seven experts, including 10 academic geographers and 17 senior high school geography teachers, contributed through questionnaire surveys. A set of assessment indicators and rubrics, consisting of five dimensions and 25 indicators with 6 ’important secondary indicators’ were developed accordingly. Results show that indicators which are ’beyond high school student capabilities‘, ’statements of four levels not clearly differentiated’ or ’'not appropriate to all essay topics’ have the relative low expert consensus. The proposed indicators and rubrics can serve as a reference template, i.e., a starting point for geography teachers to develop a customized assessment scheme for their own students.
Description
Keywords
專題導向學習, 模糊德爾菲法, 評分規準, 高中地理, Project-based learning, Fuzzy Delphi, Assessment rubrics, geography