缺血預處理對蹲舉運動表現之影響
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2018
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
目的：本研究旨在探討缺血預處理 (ischemic preconditioning, IPC) 對於具規律阻力訓練經驗者的平行蹲舉 (parallel squat) 運動表現之影響。方法：本研究共招募12名成年男性 (年齡，23 ± 2歲；身高，176 ± 7公分；體重，76 ± 15公斤；蹲舉最大肌力，125 ± 42公斤)。每位受試者需先進行2次控制處理 (CON)，然後，再依隨機交叉之方式接受LIPC處理 (local IPC，加壓220 mmHg) 與SHAM處理 (加壓20 mmHg)，其中LIPC與SHAM包含進行4個循環的5分鐘缺血與5分鐘再灌流。實驗處理結束後，受試者需在測力板上進行4組平行蹲舉測驗，負荷設定為60% 1 RM (repetition maximum, RM)，並於第4組蹲舉測驗中，要求受試者盡可能多地實施蹲舉運動至衰竭。結果：LIPC在蹲舉測驗時的反覆次數 (LIPC vs. SHAM vs. CON, 23 ± 5 vs. 20 ± 4 vs. 19 ± 4下, p = .001) 及運動量 (LIPC vs. SHAM vs. CON, 1627.2 ± 527.3 vs. 1456.7 ± 488.2 vs. 1341.3 ± 428.2公斤, p = .001)，均明顯高於其他實驗處理。在平均力量輸出、最大發力率與瞬時發力率方面，LIPC皆明顯高於CON (p< .05)。此外，在蹲舉測驗過程中的肌肉氧飽和度、血乳酸與運動強度自覺分數，在各實驗處理之間均無顯著差異。結論：LIPC能促進具有阻力訓練經驗者的蹲舉運動表現，然而，LIPC不會改變衰竭性蹲舉運動時的運動肌群血流量與氧飽和度。
Purpose: This study investigated the effect of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) on parallel squat performance in individuals with regular resistance training experiences. Methods: Twelve males were recruited [age, 23 ± 2 years; height, 176 ± 7 cm; body mass, 76 ± 15 kg; squat 1RM (repetition maximum), 125 ± 42 kg] in this study. All participants were required to conduct 2 control (CON) treatments, and then performed LIPC (local IPC, 220 mmHg) and SHAM (20 mmHg) treatments in randomized crossover design. The LIPC and SHAM included 4 cycles of 5-min ischemia and 5-min reperfusion. During the squat test, participants performed 4 sets of parallel squat at 60% 1RM on the force platform. At the fourth set, participants were asked to perform as many repetitions as possible until exhaustion. Results: The number of repetitions (LIPC vs. SHAM vs. CON, 23 ± 5 vs. 20 ± 4 vs. 19 ± 4 reps, p = .001) and exercise volume (LIPC vs. SHAM vs. CON, 1627 ± 527 vs. 1457 ± 488 vs. 1341 ± 428 kg, p = .001) in LIPC were significantly greater than the others. The average force, maximal and instantaneous rate of force development in LIPC were significantly higher than those in CON (p< .05). There were no significant differences in tissue saturation index, blood lactate concentration, and rating of perceived exertion during squat test among treatments. Conclusion: LIPC might improve the squat performance in resistance-trained individuals, however, LIPC would not change the blood flow and muscular oxygenation during exhaustive squat exercise.
Purpose: This study investigated the effect of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) on parallel squat performance in individuals with regular resistance training experiences. Methods: Twelve males were recruited [age, 23 ± 2 years; height, 176 ± 7 cm; body mass, 76 ± 15 kg; squat 1RM (repetition maximum), 125 ± 42 kg] in this study. All participants were required to conduct 2 control (CON) treatments, and then performed LIPC (local IPC, 220 mmHg) and SHAM (20 mmHg) treatments in randomized crossover design. The LIPC and SHAM included 4 cycles of 5-min ischemia and 5-min reperfusion. During the squat test, participants performed 4 sets of parallel squat at 60% 1RM on the force platform. At the fourth set, participants were asked to perform as many repetitions as possible until exhaustion. Results: The number of repetitions (LIPC vs. SHAM vs. CON, 23 ± 5 vs. 20 ± 4 vs. 19 ± 4 reps, p = .001) and exercise volume (LIPC vs. SHAM vs. CON, 1627 ± 527 vs. 1457 ± 488 vs. 1341 ± 428 kg, p = .001) in LIPC were significantly greater than the others. The average force, maximal and instantaneous rate of force development in LIPC were significantly higher than those in CON (p< .05). There were no significant differences in tissue saturation index, blood lactate concentration, and rating of perceived exertion during squat test among treatments. Conclusion: LIPC might improve the squat performance in resistance-trained individuals, however, LIPC would not change the blood flow and muscular oxygenation during exhaustive squat exercise.
Description
Keywords
再灌流, 血流阻斷, 阻力運動, 熱身活動, reperfusion, blood flow occlusion, resistance training, warm up