跨領域統整課程教學實施之個案研究：以開平餐飲學校為例

Abstract

研究旨在探討技術型高中推動跨領域主題式教學之發展歷程與成效，以開平餐飲學校跨領域主題式課程「家族菜臺灣味」為研究個案，深入分析教師如何協作設計、因應教學挑戰並促進自身專業成長。研究採質性取向的個案研究法，透過個別訪談蒐集資料進行分析，並結合文獻探討進行歸納詮釋。研究結果顯示，跨領域主題式課程能有效串連多學科知識，並以「家族菜」真實情境與家庭文化資源激發學生的學習動機與自我認同。教師雖面臨課時不足、家庭背景差異與翻轉學習適應等挑戰，但透過團隊備課、差異化教學與行動反思等，持續強化課程品質並獲得專業成長。課程成果深化學生對自我與家族文化的理解，並顯示家庭參與對學習動力的重要性。基於以上發現，本研究分別對教師、學校及未來研究提出建議。就教師而言，宜善用主題式課程整合與差異化教學，並結合同儕協作，共同挖掘家庭文化價值；在學校層面，建議行政單位提供課程彈性調整之協助、適切資源設備，及鼓勵家長投入課程互動，以奠定跨領域教學的制度基礎；未來研究則可採縱貫性或多元研究設計，長期追蹤學生在自我認同、學業成就與家庭互動上的成效。最終期盼此研究能為技術型高中跨領域教學提供可行參考與持續發展空間。

This study aimed to explore the developmental process and outcomes of promoting cross-disciplinary, theme-based instruction in technical high schools, focusing on the “Family Cuisine: The Taste of Taiwan” course as a case example. Through in-depth analysis, the research examined how teachers collaborated on curriculum design, responded to instructional challenges, and fostered their own professional growth. By adopting a qualitative case study approach, data were collected and analyzed via interviews, and this process was supplemented by a review of relevant literature for synthesis and interpretation.The findings indicate that such cross-disciplinary, theme-based curricula can effectively integrate multiple subject areas. By incorporating authentic contexts of “family cuisine” and leveraging family cultural resources, the course stimulated students’ learning motivation and sense of self-identity. Although teachers faced challenges such as limited class time, diverse family backgrounds, and adaptation to flipped learning, they continuously improved course quality and achieved professional growth through collaborative lesson planning, differentiated instructional strategies, and reflective practice mechanisms. The course outcomes not only enhanced students’ understanding of themselves and their family cultures but also underscored the importance of family involvement in fostering learning motivation and emotional development.Based on these findings, the study offers recommendations in three main areas—teachers, schools, and future research. For teachers, it emphasizes making full use of thematic integration and differentiated teaching, working collaboratively with peers, and delving deeply into the value of family culture. For schools, it recommends that administrators provide flexible course scheduling, appropriate facilities and resources, and encourage family engagement mechanisms to lay a structural foundation for cross-disciplinary teaching. Regarding future research, employing longitudinal or more nuanced multi-method designs could track students’ development in self-identity, academic achievement, and family interactions over time, thereby building a more comprehensive evidence base for cross-disciplinary curricula. Ultimately, it is hoped that this study will serve as a practical reference for cross-disciplinary teaching in technical high schools, providing space for continuous development.