抗拒乎?拒絕乎?偏差乎?學生文化研究中抗拒概念之誤用與澄清
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2011-09-??
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
國立台灣師範大學教育學系
Department od Education, NTNU
Department od Education, NTNU
Abstract
許多學生文化的研究中，誤將「拒絕」或「偏差」當成「抗拒J .疏於描述支配群體的壓迫，或只聚焦於特定層面的抗拒，使文化的描述不夠厚實，徒具抗拒理論的浪漫色彩，降低其理論效度與分析的效力，殊為可惜。本研究之主要目的即在澄清抗拒概念的意義，並提出研究抗拒時宜蒐集哪些資料、考量哪些議題、避免哪些問題。本研究並延伸討論過去在質性研究經常被忽略的理論效度，期盼後績的質性研究能對教育理論與實務，有更多的貢獻。
This 叮ticle clarifies the meaning of resistance and other related concepts employed in qualitative research of student cultures. In addition, it discusses the theoretical validity of resistance. Based on literature review and the author's ethnographic research，this article points out several mistakes in the research on student resistance culture such as I) interpreting rejection or deviance as resistance; 2) focusing only on a particular life aspect of student resisters; 3) omitting to recount the concrete targets of student resistance. These mistakes make the description of student culture too “ thin" to grasp the holistic picture of student life and produce some problems of theoretical validity. Critical issues of perfonning resistance research are also suggested.
This 叮ticle clarifies the meaning of resistance and other related concepts employed in qualitative research of student cultures. In addition, it discusses the theoretical validity of resistance. Based on literature review and the author's ethnographic research，this article points out several mistakes in the research on student resistance culture such as I) interpreting rejection or deviance as resistance; 2) focusing only on a particular life aspect of student resisters; 3) omitting to recount the concrete targets of student resistance. These mistakes make the description of student culture too “ thin" to grasp the holistic picture of student life and produce some problems of theoretical validity. Critical issues of perfonning resistance research are also suggested.