我國大學藝文中心典藏管理機制之探討-以中興大學典藏作品為例
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2018
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
本研究以具典藏作品功能的國內大學藝文中心(亦有稱藝術中心)為對象進行探討，旨在探討國內藝文中心典藏作品脈絡，依各藝文中心特色典藏作品、典藏機構的管理機制、藝術家意願捐贈三者間的關係，並以國立中興大學藝術中心為例，採用資料蒐集的方法是文獻分析、問卷調查及訪談法三種，藉著實證資料之蒐集，以為分析討論的根據。有助於瞭解國內藝文中心典藏文物的實際狀況，及典藏管理策略對於藝文中心的顯著影響，提供藝文中心典藏經營者實務應用的參考價值，達成永續經營的目標。
透過歷史文獻研讀、質性訪談與專家檢視後的變項歸納設計的問卷，選取填答對象，由各校原本錯綜複雜的典藏脈絡化繁為簡，區分受贈的藏館經營者及藝術品捐贈者兩群組的問卷填答結果，利用SPSS統計軟體進行敘述性分析、 T檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森檢定相關分析。結果發現：典藏來源及主事者喜好對於典藏管理策略有顯著的正向影響；典藏管理策略對於藝文中心的典藏作品有顯著的正向影響；典藏來源及主事者喜好對於藝文中心的典藏作品有顯著的正向影響。
最後綜合文獻、問卷結果及訪談內容提出以下結論，可提供大學藝文中心未來典藏經營管理以及後續研究的參考，結論發現：身分背景對於藝文中心典藏文物的影響差異，如：藝術家對於 「空間設施」、「管理機制」最為重視；「典藏管理策略」對於藝文中心典藏文物的影響顯著，藝文中心對於「典藏管理策略」越重視，相對藝術家信賴度也越高，捐贈作品的意願越能提升，館藏數量自然能夠增加；典藏作品後續推廣應用的影響效應，如：展覽、文創品製作、數位典藏…等後續許多推廣典藏作品的管道，可活化藝文中心典藏，深具意義。後續研究的建議：可針對參觀的校內師生或觀眾對於大學藝文中心典藏作品的想法見解，並進行量化或質性研究探討，可藉此補充量化遺漏之對象。
The research investigated the centers of art and culture (also referred to as art centers) located at Taiwan’s universities which had the capacities to archive artworks. It aimed at exploring the contexts of artwork archiving in these centers in accordance with relationships among the featured collections, the management mechanism as well as artists’ willingness of donating their artworks. Moreover, in this research, the National Chung Hsing University Art Center was a case in point and the methods for data collection applied herein included literature analysis, questionnaire as well as interview. The empirical data collected served as the basis of analysis and discussion, which was conductive to understanding the actual condition of artwork collection in these centers as well as the significant impacts the collection management strategies exerting on these centers, thereby providing art collection operators with practical reference and assisting them in achieving the goal of sustainable development. The questionnaires were summarized and designed by referring to historical literature, qualitative interviews, and variables reviewed by experts, and then the participants were selected accordingly. The questionnaires were prepared by simplifying the complex artwork archiving process. As such, the results from the questionnaires were divided into only two groups, i.e. the artwork receivers’ and the givers’. The SPSS statistical software was used to do the descriptive analysis, t-test, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson correlation analysis. According to the results, the collection sources and the preference of the person in charge had significantly positive influences on collection management strategies; the collection management strategies had significantly positive influences on art collections in the art centers; the collection sources and the preference of the person in charge had significantly positive influences on the artworks collected in the art centers. In the end, the following conclusions were put forward based on the literature, questionnaire results and interview contents to provide reference for university art centers and future research in terms of collection management. The conclusions are as follows: (1) the identity and background had different effects on collected artworks in the art centers. For example, artists paid most attention to “space facilities” and “management mechanism”; (2) “collection management strategies” had significant influences on the artworks collected in the art centers and the greater importance the art centers attached to “collection management strategies,” the higher artists’ trust would be, which would bolster artists’ willingness to donate artworks and, as such, also augment the number of artworks donated; (3) Promotion venues and tools such as exhibition, creative production, and digital archiving could help foster the application of the artwork collections, which was profoundly meaningful in vivifying the art centers, locations conventionally considered to belong to only very few art lovers. Suggestions for future researches include: the successive researches can focus on the opinions and views of students, teachers or audiences who have visited the art centers. Their opinions and views can supplement the omissions of quantitative researches.
The research investigated the centers of art and culture (also referred to as art centers) located at Taiwan’s universities which had the capacities to archive artworks. It aimed at exploring the contexts of artwork archiving in these centers in accordance with relationships among the featured collections, the management mechanism as well as artists’ willingness of donating their artworks. Moreover, in this research, the National Chung Hsing University Art Center was a case in point and the methods for data collection applied herein included literature analysis, questionnaire as well as interview. The empirical data collected served as the basis of analysis and discussion, which was conductive to understanding the actual condition of artwork collection in these centers as well as the significant impacts the collection management strategies exerting on these centers, thereby providing art collection operators with practical reference and assisting them in achieving the goal of sustainable development. The questionnaires were summarized and designed by referring to historical literature, qualitative interviews, and variables reviewed by experts, and then the participants were selected accordingly. The questionnaires were prepared by simplifying the complex artwork archiving process. As such, the results from the questionnaires were divided into only two groups, i.e. the artwork receivers’ and the givers’. The SPSS statistical software was used to do the descriptive analysis, t-test, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson correlation analysis. According to the results, the collection sources and the preference of the person in charge had significantly positive influences on collection management strategies; the collection management strategies had significantly positive influences on art collections in the art centers; the collection sources and the preference of the person in charge had significantly positive influences on the artworks collected in the art centers. In the end, the following conclusions were put forward based on the literature, questionnaire results and interview contents to provide reference for university art centers and future research in terms of collection management. The conclusions are as follows: (1) the identity and background had different effects on collected artworks in the art centers. For example, artists paid most attention to “space facilities” and “management mechanism”; (2) “collection management strategies” had significant influences on the artworks collected in the art centers and the greater importance the art centers attached to “collection management strategies,” the higher artists’ trust would be, which would bolster artists’ willingness to donate artworks and, as such, also augment the number of artworks donated; (3) Promotion venues and tools such as exhibition, creative production, and digital archiving could help foster the application of the artwork collections, which was profoundly meaningful in vivifying the art centers, locations conventionally considered to belong to only very few art lovers. Suggestions for future researches include: the successive researches can focus on the opinions and views of students, teachers or audiences who have visited the art centers. Their opinions and views can supplement the omissions of quantitative researches.
Description
Keywords
典藏作品, 大學藝文中心, 藝術中心, 典藏管理策略, Art Collection, University Center for Art and Culture, Art Center, Collection Management Strategy