影響督導工作同盟發展之要素
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2012-03-??
Authors
蔡秀玲
Shiou-Ling Tsai
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
國立臺灣師範大學教育心理學系
Department of Educational Psychology, NTNU
Department of Educational Psychology, NTNU
Abstract
本研究旨在從督導者與受督者的角度檢視影響督導工作同盟發展之相關要素。本研究共邀請七組督導配對在督導初期與後期分別進行深度訪談，所收集的訪談資料採用開放性譯碼進行分析，結果發現影響督導工作同盟的因素包括督導結構、督導者行為、受督者投入狀態以及督導成效等四大類別，督導雙方均肯定清楚的場面構成、諮商取向適配、催化性督導者行為、受督者的開放、督導成效與受督者個人表現焦律對督導工作同盟之影響。此外，受督者更是提到督導者對受督者個人的關心有助於同盟，模糊督導架構、督導者的嚴肅與對受督者的質疑，以及受督者對督導關係的焦慮、有礙同盟;督導者則強調受督者的主動性與持續督導同一個案對工作同盟的重要性，以及受督者不表達需求有礙督導工作同盟。
The purpose of this study was to examine the critical factors in the development of supervisory working alliance from bothperspectives of the supervisors and supervisees. Seven supervisor-supervisee dyads participated in the study. Each ofsupervisors and supervisees was interviewed to identify specific factors influencing the alliance formation at the beginningand final stage of supervision. Four domains including supervision structure, supervisor's behaviors, supervisee'sinvolvement, and supervision effects were emerged. Supervisees emphasized that supervisor's care for them was helpful foralliance-building, whereas vogue supervision structure, supervisor's seriousness, and supervisee's anxiety for the supervisoryrelationship were hindering factors. Supervisors highlighted the importance ofsupervisee's active involvement and continualdiscussion of a same client, and hoped that supervisees could express their needs in supervision. The implications of thesefindings and suggestions for future research as well as supervision training and practice were also discussed.
The purpose of this study was to examine the critical factors in the development of supervisory working alliance from bothperspectives of the supervisors and supervisees. Seven supervisor-supervisee dyads participated in the study. Each ofsupervisors and supervisees was interviewed to identify specific factors influencing the alliance formation at the beginningand final stage of supervision. Four domains including supervision structure, supervisor's behaviors, supervisee'sinvolvement, and supervision effects were emerged. Supervisees emphasized that supervisor's care for them was helpful foralliance-building, whereas vogue supervision structure, supervisor's seriousness, and supervisee's anxiety for the supervisoryrelationship were hindering factors. Supervisors highlighted the importance ofsupervisee's active involvement and continualdiscussion of a same client, and hoped that supervisees could express their needs in supervision. The implications of thesefindings and suggestions for future research as well as supervision training and practice were also discussed.