文學院
Permanent URI for this communityhttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/2
院成立於民國44年，歷經50餘年的銳意發展，目前設有國文、英文、歷史、地理、臺文等5個學系、翻譯和臺灣史2個獨立所，以及全球華人寫作中心和國際臺灣學研究中心。除臺史所僅設碩士班，其餘6個系所均設有碩、博士班；目前專兼任教師近250人，學生約2500餘人。
本院早期以培養優秀中學國文、英文、歷史和地理教師為鵠的，臺灣中學語文和史地教育的實踐與成功，本院提供不可磨滅的貢獻。近年來，本院隨師範體系轉型而調整發展方向，除維持中學師資培育的優勢外，也積極朝理論研究和實務操作等面向前進。目前，本院各系所師培生的教師檢定通過率平均在95%以上；非師培生在文化、傳播、文學、應用史學及環境災害、地理資訊系統等領域發展，也已卓然有成。
本院各系所教師的研究能量極為豐富，參與國內外學術活動相當活躍。根據論文數量、引用次數等指標所作的學術力評比，本院居人文領域全國第2名。各系所之間，無論是教師的教學與研究，或學生的生活與學習，都能相輔相成、榮辱與共，彼此渾然一體，足堪「為師、為範」而無愧。
News
Browse
5 results
Search Results
Item 台南人劇團「莎士比亞不插電」系列研究(2022) 黃鈺琳; Huang, Yu-Lin於文化交流密切、頻繁之今日，「跨文化劇場」、「跨文化改編」早已成為東西方學術研究關注的議題。本文以台南人劇團「莎士比亞不插電」系列作品為題，探討統攝在「不插電」的整體概念下，劇團所為之改編策略。自導演編排調度、舞美設計、情節結構、語言運用、角色形塑等層面，討論系列劇作於遵循原著經典的脈絡下，為何及如何進行改編、改編版本的戲劇內涵，以及原著文化至標的文化所為之調整。本研究主要從二面向進行資料耙梳，一是從劇團發展策略之角度，分析台南人劇團之領導理念和方針，以了解其面對改編之中心思想；二是從莎士比亞不插電劇目相關研究之角度，探討文化跨度之於戲劇詮釋的影響。跨文化戲劇主要橫跨文化、戲劇與文學三大領域，本論文以謝克納（Richard Schechner）主張的四大跨文化表現解釋文化流動現象；巴維（Patrice Pavis）的跨文化劇場分類及羅（Jacqueline Lo）和吉伯特（Helen Gilbert）所提出的「三橢圓圖」，檢視戲劇在改編後的屬性及文化轉譯。並以赫全（Linda Hutcheon）《改編理論》（A Theory of Adaptation）提出的六何法為檢視改編戲劇之方向，討論不同背景對於文學的側重和解讀。研究成果發現：於形式上，本系列作品皆承襲台南人劇團捨繁入簡的態度實踐「不插電」之概念；內涵層面因考量社會文化及目標觀眾之喜好，多著墨人物心理的發展變化，且容納諸多議題於戲劇中，如速食愛情、性別、毒品、生命意義、倫常、欲念追求等。表現手法多以幽默、詼諧的口吻將嚴肅的議題輕描淡寫，安排丑角、節奏輕快的音樂使戲劇氛圍不致太過沉重。語言詮釋部份從《羅密歐與茱麗葉》、《哈姆雷》反覆出現大段生僻難懂的念白，至《馬克白》、《維洛納二紳士》調整語言，臺詞兼顧文學性和表演性。台南人劇團「莎士比亞不插電」體現本土化、在地化之改編策略，特別是語言之運用，可謂塑造了莎劇臺灣化的風貌。Item 莎士比亞之漫畫與動畫改編研究: 以《哈姆雷特》及《羅密歐與茱麗葉》為例(2016) 江俞弦; Chiang, Yu-Hsien本文旨在探討莎士比亞的《哈姆雷特》及《羅密歐與茱麗葉》中的情節和台詞，如何透過圖片敘述及原著台詞的刪減，交織應用在21世紀的動畫及漫畫中，而使其產生新的詮釋及視聽感受。本論文分為五章: 緒論陳述本文所提及的漫畫及動畫版本之取材原因，以及簡述各章節概要。第一章則提供漫畫及動畫的初步認識，並運用Barbara Postema所列出的漫畫技巧，解讀圖片在故事中的敘述方式。將圖片視為一種在文本中敘述的語言，並透過漫畫的敘事架構及圖片在畫面上的配置技巧，作為分析第二章的基礎。第二章主要著重在Manga Shakespeare改編的漫畫版本中，分析僅是文字的原著劇本，如何在漫畫圖片的框架中，結合既有的台詞與漫畫的敘述架構而得以重新演釋，而產生不同的閱讀可能性及解讀方式。為了區別漫畫和動畫在改編上有所不同，第三章則以Zetsuen no Tempest和Romeo X Juliet兩部動畫作品為例，探討莎劇的角色、台詞及劇情，如何經由應用與修飾，融合劇情，進而在動畫中產生新的詮釋。與漫畫相比，動畫的重點已經不再是以不同媒介演繹莎士比亞的劇本。反之，原著中的元素(角色、情節、台詞)變成動畫敘事中的潤飾品，或是作為劇情轉折的關鍵點。最後，結論概述漫畫和動畫改編的異同，並提出閱聽者在閱讀或欣賞的當下，應將劇本或是改編作品結合自身經驗，使其產生更具意義的解讀方式。Item The Crime Scene of Revenge Tragedy(英語學系, 2012-03-??) Carol Mejia LaPerleAnalyzing the parallel gestures of ritualistic brutality deployed in the cannibal banquet of Seneca’s Thyestes and Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus, I reveal how the genre of revenge tragedies is simultaneously an instance of, and challenge to, Georges Bataille’s socio-economic theory of excess within a general economy. Excess, and not scarcity, is the motive and the condition for revenge. Both revengers react to a surplus of energy, or what I will call the “excess of possibilities,” that threatens autonomy. Thus, the victims of revenge embody the excess of possibilities in the plays since they are reminders of the contingency, and potential indistinguishability, of the agents of revenge. Sacrificial cannibalism emerges as the revenger’s means for autonomous differentiation, thus eliminating the unbearable interchangeability generated by surplus. Furthermore, by theorizing the excess of possibilities as the underlying pressure driving Atreus as a Senecan revenge figure, I argue that the citation of a specifically Senecan cannibal banquet, appropriated in Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus, is a gesture by the author to sacrifice, and thus gratuitously consume, the surplus violence generated by the act of representation itself.Item Moral Economy and the Politics of Food Riots in Coriolanus(英語學系, 2010-09-??) Elyssa Y. ChengFood riots in the Elizabethan-Jacobean period were an explosive expression of discontent over the threat of food scarcity and starvation. They were ritualisticacts used by the commoners to compel the authorities to meet the standards of moral economy and to respect the plebeians' legitimate right to eat. In Coriolanus, Shakespeare highlights contemporary Jacobean food riots by rewriting and transferring the belly fable incident of usury riots into food riots and by repetitively referring to famine, hunger, and food hoarding in the riot scenes. Like Shakespeare's contemporary food rioters, the mobs in Coriolanus do not rise up to subvert the established social order; they revolt in order to alert the authorities that their grievances must be heard and respected. By portraying the crowd as exceptionally well-organized, the playwright transforms the play into a social critique to encourage his audience to think about the potential danger of popular disruptions and to urge the authorities to contemplate the consequences of ignoring the popular voice. Through this critique, the dramatist also manages to display how hunger can turn into a formidably collective power that poses a serious threat to the ruling authorities.Item The Crime Scene of Revenge Tragedy(英語學系, 2012-03-??) Carol Mejia LaPerleAnalyzing the parallel gestures of ritualistic brutality deployed in the cannibal banquet of Seneca’s Thyestes and Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus, I reveal how the genre of revenge tragedies is simultaneously an instance of, and challenge to, Georges Bataille’s socio-economic theory of excess within a general economy. Excess, and not scarcity, is the motive and the condition for revenge. Both revengers react to a surplus of energy, or what I will call the “excess of possibilities,” that threatens autonomy. Thus, the victims of revenge embody the excess of possibilities in the plays since they are reminders of the contingency, and potential indistinguishability, of the agents of revenge. Sacrificial cannibalism emerges as the revenger’s means for autonomous differentiation, thus eliminating the unbearable interchangeability generated by surplus. Furthermore, by theorizing the excess of possibilities as the underlying pressure driving Atreus as a Senecan revenge figure, I argue that the citation of a specifically Senecan cannibal banquet, appropriated in Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus, is a gesture by the author to sacrifice, and thus gratuitously consume, the surplus violence generated by the act of representation itself.