文學院

Permanent URI for this communityhttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/2

院成立於民國44年,歷經50餘年的銳意發展,目前設有國文、英文、歷史、地理、臺文等5個學系、翻譯和臺灣史2個獨立所,以及全球華人寫作中心和國際臺灣學研究中心。除臺史所僅設碩士班,其餘6個系所均設有碩、博士班;目前專兼任教師近250人,學生約2500餘人。

本院早期以培養優秀中學國文、英文、歷史和地理教師為鵠的,臺灣中學語文和史地教育的實踐與成功,本院提供不可磨滅的貢獻。近年來,本院隨師範體系轉型而調整發展方向,除維持中學師資培育的優勢外,也積極朝理論研究和實務操作等面向前進。目前,本院各系所師培生的教師檢定通過率平均在95%以上;非師培生在文化、傳播、文學、應用史學及環境災害、地理資訊系統等領域發展,也已卓然有成。

本院各系所教師的研究能量極為豐富,參與國內外學術活動相當活躍。根據論文數量、引用次數等指標所作的學術力評比,本院居人文領域全國第2名。各系所之間,無論是教師的教學與研究,或學生的生活與學習,都能相輔相成、榮辱與共,彼此渾然一體,足堪「為師、為範」而無愧。

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item
    氣學系譜下的注莊方法論
    (2024) 方冠中; Fang, Kuan-Chung
    本研究以方法論的角度,討論歷代注解《莊子》的著作。「方法論」一詞是當代學術規範下的詞彙,指面對研究對象所採用的策略或手段。然傳統注解《莊子》的思想家們,並未對自身的注解策略進行反思,缺乏對本身著作的後設性思考。因此,本研究採用「方法論」的角度,以探析傳統注《莊》著作中所蘊藏的思維方式。本研究將傳統的解《莊》著作,分為黃老、道教、玄學、佛教、理學五個面向進行探討,以這五種時代思潮作為注解思想家的方法基礎,進而在時代思潮的框架下,產生各別著作對《莊子》的不同理解。因此,以《莊子》一書的注解與詮釋,來探析中國傳統的思維方式,並提出五種關於《莊子》用語方式,作為傳統的方法論思維。除了從傳統思維中提供當代學術的方法論思考外,亦可由以《莊子》為核心的思考方式,來調整當代方法論思維對「意識」的過度側重。在「方法論」思考方式中,實則是蘊藏著關於「本體論」的理論圖式。「氣」是莊子思想的核心,同時也是中國傳統思維的基礎。故本研究藉由對傳統解《莊》的研究來提出方法論思考外,同時也以「氣學本體論」提供對傳統思維的本體論想像。
  • Item
    Tantric Metaseity in the Rig Veda's "Creation Hymn" : A Sarkarian Reading and New Translation of X.129
    (英語學系, 2021-03-??) Justin M. Hewitson
    Western surveys of idealism have historically overlooked Indian sources as scholars were unfamiliar with Indian metaphysics and lacked appropriate exegetical translations of India’s ancient Sanskrit spiritual literature. But millennia before the (Neo)Platonists conceived their idealist arguments, Indian sages who meditated on causal consciousness produced esoteric teachings, metaphorical descriptions of abstract states, and influential philosophical ideas thatshaped the ancient worldview of monistic idealism. Many Indologists argue that the Vedic religion introduced by the prehistorical or ancient Aryan migrants into northern India catalyzed the growth of later Hindu traditions that regard Brahman (Metaseity) as the supreme ontological entity. However, P. R. Sarkar tilts the origins of Indian idealism away from this monolithic Vedic source with his polemical claim that indigenous Śiva Tantra initially existed independently from Aryan Vedic beliefs and propitiatory rites. This essay therefore interrogates the first ancient expression of metaphysics in India through a new translation and reinterpretation of the Ṛg Veda’s canonical “Creation Hymn,” mediated by Sarkar’s Tantric historiography and spiritual metaphysics. By engaging with Sarkar’s emic claim for Tantra’s spiritual and epistemic influences on Vedic thought, I reconstruct the Creation Hymn’s influential monistic ontology to explain its radical departure from the Ṛg Veda’s traditional sacerdotalism. It is proposed that monistic idealism likely originated in India and that the Creation Hymn is the first textual evidence of this philosophy infused with proto-Tantra.