吳清基Wu, Ching-Ji曹學仁Tsao, Hsueh-Jen2019-08-282007-1-302019-08-282007http://etds.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&s=id=%22GN0889000114%22.&%22.id.&http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:80/handle/20.500.12235/90264本研究旨在建構一套適合我國公立高級職業學校競爭力指標的系統，據以瞭解並檢核各公立高級職業學校的競爭力，提供各校作為加強或重視校務辦理的方向或重點，藉以提升學校教育品質，發揮學校教育效能。具體而言，研究目的有六：瞭解我國公立高職學校績效評估及其指標建構相關問題、分析我國公立高職學校競爭力指標之考量因素、建構我國公立高職學校競爭力指標系統、分析我國公立高職學校競爭力指標之集中性與一致性、分析我國公立高職學校競爭力指標的重要度、根據研究結論，提供具體可行之建議，以供未來建構高職教育競爭力指標及評估高職辦理績效時之參考。 為達成上述目的，本研究先做文獻分析，隨後進行五場次焦點團體訪談法與二次德懷術問卷調查。根據結果分析與討論，歸納結論計八項，分述如後： 一、高職學校經營績效之檢核呈現多元模式 二、高職學校競爭力指標兼重投入、過程與輸出三個面向 三、建構高職學校競爭力指標宜考量競爭力的意涵、國際教育發展的主流思潮、我國當前產業發展變遷、高級職業學校目標與定位，高職學生的核心能力等因素 四、本研究共進行五次焦點團體訪談、二次德懷術問卷調查所完成指標建構意見趨於集中並具有一致性 五、本研究所建構的高職學校競爭力指標體系包含11個領域、36個層面、144項指標並依其重要度排列 六、德懷術問卷成員對高職教育競爭力指標之重要度認定有其一致性 七、不同類型的高職學校教育人員對指標內涵的看法具有一致性 八、高職學校競爭力指標包含量化與質化指標且皆有其必要性與重要度 而有關建議的部份則分別針對教育行政機關、高職學校及後續研究提出本研究之建議，分別說明如下： 一、對教育行政機關的建議： (一)宜將高職學校競爭力指標列為重要教育政策方案，成立專責機構單位或委請學術機構長期進行高職學校競爭力評核，並建構資料庫，以瞭解高職學校發展趨勢 (二)考量對高職學校的競爭力進行評核，依目的及情境條件彈性應用本研究建構之指標 (三)充實高職學校競爭力指標的內涵並進行國際比較與接軌 (五)辦理有關高職學校競爭力指標相關研習，充實專業及應用知能 二、對高職學校的建議： (一)高職學校行政部門與教學部門應密切配合，以提昇學校競爭力 (二)界定競爭力指標操作性定義並充實其內涵以便實施學校本位檢核 (三)學校宜鼓勵教師參與指標建構以作為參與校務工作的依據 (四)學校可依本身條件自訂特色指標並參考本研究建構之指標據以推動校務發展 三、對後續研究的建議 (一)研究對象可邀請各界參與，研究範圍可擴大至私立高職 (二)進行競爭力指標後續的成效評估實作並據以修正指標 (三)以高職各群科學生核心能力為基礎建構各群科競爭力指標 (四)進行實證研究並驗證投入、過程及輸出等指標間因果之關係 (五)應用本研究建構之競爭力指標對不同條件的高職做個案研究 (六)持續進行結合教育組織及競爭力理論之研究 關鍵字：高級職業學校、教育競爭力、學校競爭力、競爭力指標、指標建構。The Development of the Competitiveness Indicators for Public Vocational High Schools in Taiwan Department of Education, National Taiwan Normal University Advisor: Wu, Ching-ji Author: Tsao, Hsueh-Jen Abstract The main purposes of this study, based on the assessment of various public vocational high schools’ efficiency in running a school, aimed to develop competitiveness indicators system suitable for the public vocational high schools in Taiwan. Specifically, this study was to achieve the following goals: 1. to understand the development of competitiveness indicators for public vocational high schools in Taiwan; 2. to understand the development of competitiveness indicators for public vocational high schools in other countries; 3. to understand the performances assessments and the indicators development for the public vocational high schools in Taiwan; 4. to analyze and develop the considered factors and theoretical bases in the process of developing the competitiveness indicators for public vocational high schools; 5. to construct the competitiveness indicators for public vocational high schools in Taiwan; 6. to provide concrete and tangible suggestions based on the conclusion of this study. To achieve the goals mentioned above, an analysis of the literature was first made by this study, which was then followed by five focus group interviews and the survey based on two questionnaires of Delphi Method. According to the result of analysis and discussion, this study brought up the following concluded remarks: 1. The models to assess public vocational schools were multiple approaches. 2. As regards the development of competitiveness indicators for public vocational high schools in Taiwan, there was still room for improvement. 3. Most of the major countries in the world had set up independent institutes in charge of the establishment of competitiveness indicators. 4. The factors to be considered in developing competitiveness indicators for public vocational high schools should include objectives of vocational high school education, expected abilities of the average vocational high school student, major educational policies, and current trends of education around the world. 5. This study achieved the development of indicators by the implementation of five focus group interviews and two questionnaires of Delphi Method. 6. The competitiveness indicators system for public vocational high schools included 11 fields of study, 36 aspects and 144 indicators, which are arranged in accordance with their scale of importance. 7. Scholars and experts could identify with the scale of importance of these school competitiveness indicators and were in agreement after two questionnaires of Delphi Method. 8. Viewpoints of different types of educational staff in public vocational high schools on the contents of indicators were consistent. 9. Both qualitative and quantitative indicators were of indispensable importance. Key Words: Vocational High School, Educational Competitiveness, School Competitiveness, Competitiveness Indicators, Indicators development高級職業學校教育競爭力學校競爭力競爭力指標指標建構