張文華Wen-Hwa Chang林宛瑩Wan-Ying Lin2019-09-052015-8-182019-09-052014http://etds.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&s=id=%22GN060143054S%22.&%22.id.&http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:80/handle/20.500.12235/104087當今科學校育課程強調融入社會性科學議題(Socio-scientific Issues，簡稱SSI)，而學生的道德判斷即與學生對議題的決策有關。本研究擬探討學生的學理背景或情緒是否會影響道德判斷的結果。 本研究利用眼球追蹤技術，探討在閱讀生物相關科學議題的敘述時，學科專業背景不同的大專生對不同類型敘述進行道德判斷，是否會受到具情緒性敘述的影響。研究材料之題目設計以教育部12年課綱中，普通高中應用生物所列的生物相關社會性議題作為架構，分為四大議題主題－農業、食品、環境、醫藥，進行包含技術或事件陳述、事件決策與事件結果與影響的三句議題敘述句。研究對象以網路招收大專生受試者，依學科背景分為具生科組與非生科組。本研究分為前測與正式實驗，兩部分。前測為利用Ｑ方法，篩選不同學科背景者情緒感受一致且顯著為正向情緒或負向情緒的題目，參與者包括生科組32人與非生科組組31人。正式實驗為利用眼動儀，探討不同學科背景學生進行道德判斷時的注意力分配與道德判斷結果有無差異，實驗組與對照組各為17人。 本研究之研究結果發現，兩組學生在道德判斷上的時間與結果並沒有達到顯著差異。但兩組學生皆同時會受到不同的議題主題或情緒題目的影響。學生們道德判斷的反應時間上，在醫藥類主題較長，在環境類上則較短。在道德判斷過程中的注意力分布上，在題目分類為負情緒時，傾向注意以負情緒描述的事件結果句子；在題目分類為正情緒時，傾向注意描述事件決策的句子。根據研究結果，我們認為：在進行社會性科學議題的道德判斷時，情緒的影響力大於學科背景。Socio-scientific Issues (SSI) in Science curriculum has been widely used. Student’s moral judgments influence their socio-scientific decision-making. It’s worthwhile to do further study about the relationship between student’s professional background as well as emotion in moral judgment. In this study, we use an eye tracker to record the process when undergraduates of different professional background making moral judgment with reading the SSI scenarios which are composed of science concepts and emotional description. The present study selected four main themes of the socioscientific topics - agriculture, food, environment and medicine, under the Newly Revised High School Curriculum Guidelines (12-Basic Guidelines) of Applied Biology. 97 Participants were recruited from the Internet and be individually tested in the study. In pretest, we used the Q methodology to measure students’ emotion when reading SSI sentences with biology professional group (N=32) and non-biology professional group (N=31). In Experiment, we used the eye tracking method to compare the eye movements and moral judgments with biology professional group (N=17) and non-biology professional group (N=17). The results indicated that, when doing moral judgment, students with different professional backgrounds was not significantly different in reaction time and fixation zone. However, the eye movements of the students were different significantly between different emotion scenarios or socioscientific topics. Reaction time of the medicine topic was significantly higher than environment topic; Total fixation duration was significantly higher in area of negative emotional description. According to literature, emotion interacts with moral judgment, we suggest that the two groups do not differ significantly in moral judgment.社會性科學議題情緒眼球追蹤技術情緒道德判斷Socio-scientific IssuesEye trackingEmotionMoral Judgment