方素琦Fang, Su-Chi楊鈞凱Yang, Chun-Kai2023-12-082026-08-152023-12-082023https://etds.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/thesis/detail/496c335161ea0ca1755aa9d47e1e7066/http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/121382108課綱正式實施，首次將「探究與實作」這個具有探究本質且強調實作活動的課程訂為高中必修課程。在以探究為本的課程成為必修課之前，台灣已經有許多關於探究式教學的研究，然而較少研究聚焦在探究式教學中教與學的過程。相較於一般的傳統課堂，探究與實作課程通常以小組活動進行，強調師生互動，因此在教學過程中教師的形成性評量就顯得格外重要。本研究的目的在了解探究與實作課程的教學實踐過程，探討一位公立高中物理教師在探究與實作課程中面對小組時所採用形成性評量的策略，以及其背後考量的因素。本研究採個案研究法，資料收集包含教師課堂綠影與半結構式訪談。資料分析以Dini et al. (2020) 的形成性評量模型為分析架構對課室中教師與小組的對話進行編碼，並以教師訪談了解教師考量的面向。研究結果顯示在擬定研究計畫階段，教師偏向使用對話型的形成性評量，著重澄清學生想法並較常使用響應式方法的推進。在資料收集、數據分析與建模階段，教師則較傾向使用權威型的形成性評量，主要使用指導性的方法推進。綜合而言，除呼應探究階段、探究任務的選擇與教學目標之外，教師當下的教學目的、小組的特性、時間的壓力與學生的學習態度，都會影響教師所採取形成性評量的策略，這也顯現出探究與實作課程中教師形成性評量的複雜性。The Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education has been fully implemented. For the first time, the course"Inquiry and Practices", which highlights the core ideas of inquiry and practical activities, is made compulsory for senior high school students. Before the “Inquiry and Practices” course, there has been a lot of research related to inquiry-based teaching in Taiwan. However, relatively few studies dig into the process of inquiry teaching and learning. Compared with traditional science course, 'Inquiry and Practices' often has students work in groups and emphasizes teacher-student interactions. Therefore, formative assessment is particularly important. The purpose of the study is to gain a deeper understanding of the teaching and learning process in the Inquiry and Practices course. Specifically, the study adopts a case-study approach to explore a physics teacher’s formative assessments with student groups and the reasons behind her actions. Data collection includes classroom videos and semi-structured teacher interviews. The formative assessment framework by Dini et al. (2020) is used for analyzing teachers' formative assessment practices, and the analysis of teacher interviews provides a window into the hidden reasons. The results show that in the phase of planning a research design, the teachers preferred to use dialogic formative assessment to clarify students' ideas, and adopt responsive approaches to advance students’ thinking. In the phase of data collection, data analysis, and modeling, the teacher is more inclined to use authoritative formative assessments. Also, she mainly took directiveapproaches to advance students’ learning. In summary, in addition to the consideration of inquiry phases, the nature of inquiry tasks, and instructional objectives, the teacher also contemplates many factors, such as the teaching purpose at that moment, the characteristics of the group, time pressure, and the students' learning attitude. This reflects the complex nature of formative assessments in the course of Inquiry and Practices.形成性評量探究與實作探究式教學formative assessmentInquiry and Practicesinquiry-based teachingetd