陳瑋婷Wei-Ting Chen2014-10-272014-10-272011-03-??http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/15758本文旨在探討《特殊教育研究學刊》自1999年至2008年共十年間,所刊登質性研究之發展趨勢。結果指出質性研究佔所有文獻的20.06%,再者筆者也分別就研究主題、主要研究參與者、質性研究方法、資料蒐集方式、信賴度及資料分析等主題進行討論。最後,本文另提出三項省思與建議。To explore the effects of writing intervention on students with learning disabilities, the author reviewed 13 researches (N=40) on writing instruction via single subject design by conducting meta-analysis. For composition quality, the average PND at posttest was 92.17% and the average PND at maintain posttest was 89.14%. For length, the average PND at posttest was 74.58%, and the average PND at maintain posttest was 74.58%. Besides, there were no statistically significant differences between dependent variables on education level and intervention type variables, as revealed by the Kruskal-Wallis procedure.特殊教育研究學刊質性研究meta-analysissingle subject designstudents with learning disabilitieswriting《特殊教育研究學刊》之質性研究趨勢A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Single Subject Design on Writing Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities