胡茹萍Hu, Ru- Ping林雅幸Lin, Ya-Hsine2019-09-042022-08-282019-09-042017http://etds.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dstdcdr&s=id=%22G080170002H%22.&%22.id.&http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:80/handle/20.500.12235/98671研究能量及人才是知識經濟最重要的資源，大學必須推動創新，以重新塑造知識供給者的角色以及建立競爭優勢，大學作為研究重鎮，應將其研發成果予以商品化或技術移轉，以發揮大學作為知識創造之角色。近年來各國政府均想辦法使大學研發能對經濟影響產生貢獻，而以技術為基礎的衍生企業，就成為學校研究發展單位進行技術移轉有利的方式，可見大學衍生企業的重要性。 本研究將綜整大學推動衍生企業之先進國家學者專家研究，並試圖提出大學推動衍生企業之可行性評估指標。首先針對國內外相關文獻整理分析，其次採專家深度訪談法、專家審題問卷、模糊德懷術問卷及層級分析法問卷等方法蒐集並整合相關領域專家學者意見，發展出適合我國大學推動衍生企業之可行性評估指標架構及權重，共計5項構面10項次構面及37項評估指標，本研究結論說明如下： 一、可行性評估指標架構具適切性及一致性。 二、可行性評估指標架構構面以「商品/技術價值」最為重要。 三、「商品/技術價值」構面以「商業價值」及「技術的產業值大，能吸引創投資金投入產生衍生企業」權重較高。 四、「參與組織成員」構面以「能力特質」及「參與成員具有人際溝通、資源協調、策略規劃、關係建立、市場知識獲取、行銷管理等創新特質之能力」權重較高。 五、「財務風險評估構面」以「財務評估」及「有能力取得風險投資公司、公共資金、商業夥伴、創業天使或私人資金之投資」權重較高。 六、「大學資源支持」構面以「顯性資源」及「大學具有運作良好的技轉辦公室、育成中心或科學園區等商業化基礎建設，及創業輔導團隊」權重較高。 七、「網絡環境互動」構面以「網絡環境」及「產業環境及脈絡能接受創新」權重較高。 八、「法規評估」對大學推動衍生企業是重要的但非大學應考量事項。 九、可行性評估指標架構可提供大學在規劃推動時自我評估之用。The most important resource of knowledge economy is research energy and talent, therefore, universities must promote innovation to reshape the role of knowledge provider and establish a competitive advantage and, it should be the commercialization of research results and technology transfer to play a role of knowledge creation. In recent years, governments have to find ways to make the university research can contribute to the economic impact. As technology-based, the spin-off companies become advantageous way for university technology transfer units, visible USOs important. This study will consolidate advanced country scholars research of USOs and tried to present the feasibility evaluation index of USOs. Sorting out the USOs preliminary evaluation index architecture, followed by mining depth interview, experts moderation questionnaire, fuzzy delphi method and analytic hierarchy process to collect and integrate the relevant experts scholarly opinion, offered suitable for universities to promote spin-off companies feasibility evaluation index in Taiwan, total of 5 facets 10 sub-facets and 37 evaluation indicators. The conclusions of this study are as follows: 1. The feasibility assessment index architecture is appropriate and consistent. 2. Commodity / technical value is the most important facet of the feasibility assessment indicator structure. 3. About Facet "Commodity / technical value", we have the weight of "Business value" and "Technology industry value, which attracts venture capital investment to generate derivative enterprise" higher. 4. About Facet "Participation in members", we have the weight of "Competency trait" and "Participant members have interpersonal communication, resource coordination, strategic planning, relationship building, market knowledge acquisition, marketing management and other innovative traits" higher. 5. About Facet "Financial risk assessment", we have the weight of "Financial assessment" and "The ability to obtain venture capital firms, public funds, business partners, entrepreneurial angels or private funds" higher. 6. About Facet " University support resources", we have the weight of "Resource resources" and "University with well-established technical transfer infrastructure, education center, scientific center or scientific park and other business infrastructure and entrepreneurial guidance team" higher. 7. About Facet "Network environment interaction" , we have the weight of "Network environment" and "Industrial environment and context" higher. 8. "Regulations" are important for universities to promote derivatives, but non-university should consider matters. 9. The feasibility assessment indicator framework provides a self-assessment of the university when planning is driven.大學衍生企業可行性評估指標university spin-off companiesfeasibility evaluation index